212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31295755)
1. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs long implants (≥10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Chen S; Ou Q; Wang Y; Lin X
J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 46(12):1192-1203. PubMed ID: 31295755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented atrophic mandibles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with a 5-year post-loading follow-up.
Esposito M; Buti J; Barausse C; Gasparro R; Sammartino G; Felice P
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):267-280. PubMed ID: 31535097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Pistilli R; Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Piatelli M; Corvino V; Barausse C; Buti J; Soardi E; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are <7-mm long implants in native bone as effective as longer implants in augmented bone for the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic jaws? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Iezzi G; Perrotti V; Felice P; Barausse C; Piattelli A; Del Fabbro M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 22(5):552-566. PubMed ID: 32902123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Pistilli R; Felice P; Piattelli M; Gessaroli M; Soardi E; Barausse C; Buti J; Corvino V
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 24570980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
Esposito M; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 25422826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up.
Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 25422824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31116186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs. long implants in augmented bone and their impact on peri-implant bone in maxilla and/or mandible: Systematic review.
Amine M; Guelzim Y; Benfaida S; Bennani A; Andoh A
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 120(2):133-142. PubMed ID: 30472460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Di Simone S; Ippolito DR; Felice P
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 31116187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 3-year post-loading report of a randomised controlled trial on the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic mandibles: short implants or longer implants in vertically augmented bone?
Esposito M; Cannizarro G; Soardi E; Pellegrino G; Pistilli R; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):301-11. PubMed ID: 22282728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6-mm-long 4-mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year post-loading results from a within-person randomised controlled trial.
Felice P; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Piattelli M; Buti J; Esposito M
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 31116188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a randomised controlled trial.
Felice P; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Soardi E; Corvino V; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(2):149-61. PubMed ID: 22866291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Esposito M; Cannizzaro G; Soardi E; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Corvino V; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 22518377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CA; Ferro-Alves ML; Okamoto R; Mendonça MR; Pellizzer EP
J Dent; 2016 Apr; 47():8-17. PubMed ID: 26804969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short dental implant as alternative to long implant with bone augmentation of the atrophic posterior ridge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
Altaib FH; Alqutaibi AY; Al-Fahd A; Eid S
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):636-650. PubMed ID: 31372602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long × 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial.
Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Piattelli M; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(2):175-187. PubMed ID: 29806665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rehabilitation of postrior atrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilot randomised clinical trial.
Esposito M; Pellegrino G; Pistilli R; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 21594216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
