BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

620 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31296094)

  • 1. Hemodynamic Effects of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Ventricular Septal Defect.
    Pahuja M; Schrage B; Westermann D; Basir MB; Garan AR; Burkhoff D
    Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Jul; 12(7):e005981. PubMed ID: 31296094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemodynamic support with percutaneous devices in patients with heart failure.
    Kapur NK; Esposito M
    Heart Fail Clin; 2015 Apr; 11(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 25834971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impella for the Management of Ventricular Septal Defect Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A European Multicenter Registry.
    Delmas C; Barbosa H; David CH; Bouisset F; Piriou PG; Roubille F; Leick J; Pavlov M; Leurent G; Potapov EV; Linke A; Mierke J; Lanmüller P; Mangner N
    ASAIO J; 2023 Dec; 69(12):e491-e499. PubMed ID: 37935014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Device profile of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 system for mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock: overview of its safety and efficacy.
    Pahuja M; Hernandez-Montfort J; Whitehead EH; Kawabori M; Kapur NK
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34894975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Miller PE; Solomon MA; McAreavey D
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1922-1929. PubMed ID: 28857849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of intraoperative implantation of Impella 5.5 SmartAssist in the Management of Acute Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Defect with cardiogenic shock.
    Madjarov JM; Katz MG; Madzharov S; Fazal S; Robicsek F
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 May; 16(1):132. PubMed ID: 34001192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Telukuntla KS; Estep JD
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2020; 16(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 32280415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Mandawat A; Rao SV
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28500136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Rise of Endovascular Mechanical Circulatory Support Use for Cardiogenic Shock and High Risk Coronary Intervention: Considerations and Challenges.
    Schwartz B; Jain P; Salama M; Kapur NK
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2021 Feb; 19(2):151-164. PubMed ID: 33356662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus counterpulsatile, pulsatile, and continuous left ventricular unloading for pediatric mechanical circulatory support.
    Bartoli CR; Koenig SC; Ionan C; Gillars KJ; Mitchell ME; Austin EH; Gray LA; Pantalos GM
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2013 Nov; 14(9):e424-37. PubMed ID: 24108116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical outcomes of bridge-to-bridge therapy with extracorporeal left ventricular assist device for acute myocardial infarction in cardiogenic shock.
    Tokunaga C; Iguchi A; Nakajima H; Chubachi F; Hori Y; Takazawa A; Hayashi J; Asakura T; Yoshitake A
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Feb; 22(1):54. PubMed ID: 35172726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of intraaortic balloon pumping on acute myocardial infarction in 64 cases of cardiogenic shock, severe heart failure and mechanical heart failure.
    Ida T; Yamate N; Osaka S; Takei H; Ikeshita M; Shoji T; Tanaka K; Takano T
    Jpn Circ J; 1984 Mar; 48(3):276-87. PubMed ID: 6708297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.
    Berg DD; Barnett CF; Kenigsberg BB; Papolos A; Alviar CL; Baird-Zars VM; Barsness GW; Bohula EA; Brennan J; Burke JA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Cremer PC; Daniels LB; DeFilippis AP; Gerber DA; Granger CB; Hollenberg S; Horowitz JM; Gladden JD; Katz JN; Keeley EC; Keller N; Kontos MC; Lawler PR; Menon V; Metkus TS; Miller PE; Nativi-Nicolau J; Newby LK; Park JG; Phreaner N; Roswell RO; Schulman SP; Sinha SS; Snell RJ; Solomon MA; Teuteberg JJ; Tymchak W; van Diepen S; Morrow DA
    Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Nov; 12(11):e006635. PubMed ID: 31707801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective Comparison of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Garan AR; Takeda K; Salna M; Vandenberge J; Doshi D; Karmpaliotis D; Kirtane AJ; Takayama H; Kurlansky P
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 May; 8(9):e012171. PubMed ID: 31041870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel minimally invasive surgical approach using an external ventricular assist device and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in refractory cardiogenic shock.
    Takeda K; Garan AR; Topkara VK; Kirtane AJ; Karmpaliotis D; Kurlansky P; Yuzefpolskaya M; Colombo PC; Naka Y; Takayama H
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 51(3):591-596. PubMed ID: 27818380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ECMO and Impella Support Strategies as a Bridge to Surgical Repair of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.
    Coyan G; Anand N; Imran M; Gomez H; Ramanan R; Murray H; Sanon S; Yoon P; Kaczorowski D; Bonatti J
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Apr; 58(5):. PubMed ID: 35630028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.