These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31296265)
21. Inter-reviewer reliability of human literature reviewing and implications for the introduction of machine-assisted systematic reviews: a mixed-methods review. Hanegraaf P; Wondimu A; Mosselman JJ; de Jong R; Abogunrin S; Queiros L; Lane M; Postma MJ; Boersma C; van der Schans J BMJ Open; 2024 Mar; 14(3):e076912. PubMed ID: 38508610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Automated screening of research studies for systematic reviews using study characteristics. Tsafnat G; Glasziou P; Karystianis G; Coiera E Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 7(1):64. PubMed ID: 29695296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Evidence synthesis 2.0: how artificial intelligence is making systematic reviews more efficient.]. Petri D Recenti Prog Med; 2023 Jun; 114(6):359-361. PubMed ID: 37229683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A practical overview of how to conduct a systematic review. Davis D Nurs Stand; 2016 Nov; 31(12):60-71. PubMed ID: 27897766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr's relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews. Gates A; Gates M; Sebastianski M; Guitard S; Elliott SA; Hartling L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):139. PubMed ID: 32493228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR). O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Shemilt I; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Wolfe MS Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 8(1):57. PubMed ID: 30786933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR). O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Wolfe MS Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 29316980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of a semi-automated data extraction tool for public health literature-based reviews: Dextr. Walker VR; Schmitt CP; Wolfe MS; Nowak AJ; Kulesza K; Williams AR; Shin R; Cohen J; Burch D; Stout MD; Shipkowski KA; Rooney AA Environ Int; 2022 Jan; 159():107025. PubMed ID: 34920276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Machine learning applications to neuroimaging for glioma detection and classification: An artificial intelligence augmented systematic review. Buchlak QD; Esmaili N; Leveque JC; Bennett C; Farrokhi F; Piccardi M J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 89():177-198. PubMed ID: 34119265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. (Semi)automated approaches to data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in social sciences: A living review. Legate A; Nimon K; Noblin A F1000Res; 2024; 13():664. PubMed ID: 39220382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools. Gates A; Guitard S; Pillay J; Elliott SA; Dyson MP; Newton AS; Hartling L Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):278. PubMed ID: 31727150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Deep Neural Network for Reducing the Screening Workload in Systematic Reviews for Clinical Guidelines: Algorithm Validation Study. Yamada T; Yoneoka D; Hiraike Y; Hino K; Toyoshiba H; Shishido A; Noma H; Shojima N; Yamauchi T J Med Internet Res; 2020 Dec; 22(12):e22422. PubMed ID: 33262102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bias and ethical considerations in machine learning and the automation of perioperative risk assessment. O'Reilly-Shah VN; Gentry KR; Walters AM; Zivot J; Anderson CT; Tighe PJ Br J Anaesth; 2020 Dec; 125(6):843-846. PubMed ID: 32838979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A novel tool that allows interactive screening of PubMed citations showed promise for the semi-automation of identification of Biomedical Literature. Adam GP; Pappas D; Papageorgiou H; Evangelou E; Trikalinos TA J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 150():63-71. PubMed ID: 35738306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey. Scott AM; Forbes C; Clark J; Carter M; Glasziou P; Munn Z J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():80-94. PubMed ID: 34242757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Towards Autonomous Living Meta-Analyses: A Framework for Automation of Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Górska A; Tacconelli E Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Aug; 316():378-382. PubMed ID: 39176757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Software engineering principles address current problems in the systematic review ecosystem. Bashir R; Dunn AG J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 May; 109():136-141. PubMed ID: 30582972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]