BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31297633)

  • 1. Inter-vendor reproducibility and accuracy of segmental left ventricular strain measurements using CMR feature tracking.
    Dobrovie M; Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6846-6857. PubMed ID: 31297633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms.
    Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5137-5147. PubMed ID: 29872912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment: Are CMR feature-tracking algorithms useful in the clinical setting?
    Pierpaolo P; Rolf S; Manuel BP; Davide C; Dresselaers T; Claus P; Bogaert J
    Radiol Med; 2020 May; 125(5):444-450. PubMed ID: 32125636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards standardized postprocessing of global longitudinal strain by feature tracking - OptiStrain CMR-FT study.
    Heinke R; Pathan F; Le M; D'Angelo T; Winau L; Arendt C; Vogl TJ; Zeiher A; Nagel E; Puntmann VO
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 Nov; 19(1):267. PubMed ID: 31775656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of myocardial strain in patients with isolated left ventricular non-compaction and healthy subjects using deformable registration algorithm: comparison with feature tracking.
    Liu J; Li Y; Cui Y; Cao Y; Yao S; Zhou X; Wetzl J; Zeng W; Shi H
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Sep; 20(1):400. PubMed ID: 32883201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of feature tracking, fast-SENC, and myocardial tagging for global and segmental left ventricular strain.
    Bucius P; Erley J; Tanacli R; Zieschang V; Giusca S; Korosoglou G; Steen H; Stehning C; Pieske B; Pieske-Kraigher E; Schuster A; Lapinskas T; Kelle S
    ESC Heart Fail; 2020 Apr; 7(2):523-532. PubMed ID: 31800152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved segmental myocardial strain reproducibility using deformable registration algorithms compared with feature tracking cardiac MRI and speckle tracking echocardiography.
    Wang J; Li W; Sun J; Liu H; Kang Y; Yang D; Yu L; Greiser A; Zhou X; Han Y; Chen Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):404-414. PubMed ID: 29283466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced myocardial characterization in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: feasibility of CMR-based feature tracking strain analysis in a case-control study.
    Yang L; Zhang L; Cao S; Gao C; Xu H; Song T; Zhang X; Wang K
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6118-6128. PubMed ID: 32588208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking using a non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm: assessment of variability in a real-life clinical setting.
    Morais P; Marchi A; Bogaert JA; Dresselaers T; Heyde B; D'hooge J; Bogaert J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Feb; 19(1):24. PubMed ID: 28209163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-vendor variability of left ventricular volumes and strains determined by three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography.
    Yuda S; Sato Y; Abe K; Kawamukai M; Kouzu H; Muranaka A; Kokubu N; Hashimoto A; Tsuchihashi K; Watanabe N; Miura T
    Echocardiography; 2014 May; 31(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 25070187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking.
    Morton G; Schuster A; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jun; 14(1):43. PubMed ID: 22721175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature tracking compared with tissue tagging measurements of segmental strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Wu L; Germans T; Güçlü A; Heymans MW; Allaart CP; van Rossum AC
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jan; 16(1):10. PubMed ID: 24450803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking: Impact of training on observer performance and reproducibility.
    Backhaus SJ; Metschies G; Billing M; Kowallick JT; Gertz RJ; Lapinskas T; Pieske B; Lotz J; Bigalke B; Kutty S; Hasenfuß G; Beerbaum P; Kelle S; Schuster A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210127. PubMed ID: 30682045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-vendor reproducibility of left and right ventricular cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature-tracking.
    Gertz RJ; Lange T; Kowallick JT; Backhaus SJ; Steinmetz M; Staab W; Kutty S; Hasenfuß G; Lotz J; Schuster A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193746. PubMed ID: 29538467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multi-vendor, multi-center study on reproducibility and comparability of fast strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
    Erley J; Zieschang V; Lapinskas T; Demir A; Wiesemann S; Haass M; Osman NF; Simonetti OP; Liu Y; Patel AR; Mor-Avi V; Unal O; Johnson KM; Pieske B; Hansmann J; Schulz-Menger J; Kelle S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 May; 36(5):899-911. PubMed ID: 32056087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of global and regional magnetic resonance feature tracking derived strain parameters of the left and right ventricle.
    Schmidt B; Dick A; Treutlein M; Schiller P; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Baeßler B
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():97-105. PubMed ID: 28267556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Left ventricular mechanics assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of high-resolution speckle tracking and feature tracking.
    Aurich M; Keller M; Greiner S; Steen H; Aus dem Siepen F; Riffel J; Katus HA; Buss SJ; Mereles D
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 27013249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The intra-observer reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking strain assessment is independent of field strength.
    Schuster A; Morton G; Hussain ST; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Asrress KN; Makowski MR; Bigalke B; Perera D; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 23246014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived myocardial strain in asymptomatic heart transplanted patients and its correlation with late gadolinium enhancement.
    Shen X; Yuan Y; Yang M; Wang J; Sun W; Xie M; Zhang L; Zhou X; Liang B
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4337-4346. PubMed ID: 32232791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility and inter-vendor variability of left ventricular deformation measurements by three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography.
    Gayat E; Ahmad H; Weinert L; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2011 Aug; 24(8):878-85. PubMed ID: 21645991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.