234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31299147)
21. Methane and Benzene in Drinking-Water Wells Overlying the Eagle Ford, Fayetteville, and Haynesville Shale Hydrocarbon Production Areas.
McMahon PB; Barlow JRB; Engle MA; Belitz K; Ging PB; Hunt AG; Jurgens BC; Kharaka YK; Tollett RW; Kresse TM
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Jun; 51(12):6727-6734. PubMed ID: 28562061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of methane sources in groundwater in northeastern Pennsylvania.
Molofsky LJ; Connor JA; Wylie AS; Wagner T; Farhat SK
Ground Water; 2013; 51(3):333-49. PubMed ID: 23560830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Distribution and origin of groundwater methane in the Wattenberg oil and gas field of northern Colorado.
Li H; Carlson KH
Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(3):1484-91. PubMed ID: 24456231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Methane in groundwater from a leaking gas well, Piceance Basin, Colorado, USA.
McMahon PB; Thomas JC; Crawford JT; Dornblaser MM; Hunt AG
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Sep; 634():791-801. PubMed ID: 29653424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Concurrence of aqueous and gas phase contamination of groundwater in the Wattenberg oil and gas field of northern Colorado.
Li H; Son JH; Carlson KH
Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():458-466. PubMed ID: 26519629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Utica Shale Play Oil and Gas Brines: Geochemistry and Factors Influencing Wastewater Management.
Blondes MS; Shelton JL; Engle MA; Trembly JP; Doolan CA; Jubb AM; Chenault JC; Rowan EL; Haefner RJ; Mailot BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Nov; 54(21):13917-13925. PubMed ID: 33052649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania.
Warner NR; Jackson RB; Darrah TH; Osborn SG; Down A; Zhao K; White A; Vengosh A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jul; 109(30):11961-6. PubMed ID: 22778445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Drinking water while fracking: now and in the future.
Brantley SL
Ground Water; 2015; 53(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 25713828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A geochemical and multi-isotope modeling approach to determine sources and fate of methane in shallow groundwater above unconventional hydrocarbon reservoirs.
Humez P; Osselin F; Kloppmann W; Mayer B
J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Oct; 226():103525. PubMed ID: 31445435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modeling of Methane Migration in Shallow Aquifers from Shale Gas Well Drilling.
Zhang L; Soeder DJ
Ground Water; 2016 May; 54(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26280927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Microbial and Biogeochemical Indicators of Methane in Groundwater Aquifers of the Denver Basin, Colorado.
Stanish LF; Sherwood OA; Lackey G; Osborn S; Robertson CE; Harris JK; Pace N; Ryan JN
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 55(1):292-303. PubMed ID: 33296185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Methane in groundwater before, during, and after hydraulic fracturing of the Marcellus Shale.
Barth-Naftilan E; Sohng J; Saiers JE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jul; 115(27):6970-6975. PubMed ID: 29915033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mobile measurement of methane and hydrogen sulfide at natural gas production site fence lines in the Texas Barnett Shale.
Eapi GR; Sabnis MS; Sattler ML
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Aug; 64(8):927-44. PubMed ID: 25185395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High resolution spatial and temporal evolution of dissolved gases in groundwater during a controlled natural gas release experiment.
Cahill AG; Parker BL; Mayer B; Mayer KU; Cherry JA
Sci Total Environ; 2018 May; 622-623():1178-1192. PubMed ID: 29890586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Big Groundwater Data Sets Reveal Possible Rare Contamination Amid Otherwise Improved Water Quality for Some Analytes in a Region of Marcellus Shale Development.
Wen T; Niu X; Gonzales M; Zheng G; Li Z; Brantley SL
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Jun; 52(12):7149-7159. PubMed ID: 29783843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Controls on Methane Occurrences in Shallow Aquifers Overlying the Haynesville Shale Gas Field, East Texas.
Nicot JP; Larson T; Darvari R; Mickler P; Slotten M; Aldridge J; Uhlman K; Costley R
Ground Water; 2017 Jul; 55(4):443-454. PubMed ID: 28102897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Conventional Fossil Fuel Extraction, Associated Biogeochemical Processes, and Topography Influence Methane Groundwater Concentrations in Appalachia.
Li Y; Siegel HG; Thelemaque NA; Bailey KR; Moncrieffe P; Nguyen T; Clark CJ; Johnson NP; Soriano MA; Deziel NC; Saiers JE; Plata DL
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Dec; 57(48):19702-19712. PubMed ID: 37982799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Current perspectives on unconventional shale gas extraction in the Appalachian Basin.
Lampe DJ; Stolz JF
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2015; 50(5):434-46. PubMed ID: 25734820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Geochemical indicators of the origins and evolution of methane in groundwater: Gippsland Basin, Australia.
Currell M; Banfield D; Cartwright I; Cendón DI
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 May; 24(15):13168-13183. PubMed ID: 27497852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can groundwater sampling techniques used in monitoring wells influence methane concentrations and isotopes?
Rivard C; Bordeleau G; Lavoie D; Lefebvre R; Malet X
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Mar; 190(4):191. PubMed ID: 29508059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
