BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31299257)

  • 1. Impact of a ring-fitted cap on insertion time and adenoma detection: a randomized controlled trial.
    Rex DK; Kessler WR; Sagi SV; Rogers NA; Fischer M; Bohm ME; Wo JM; Dewitt JM; McHenry L; Lahr RE; Searight MP; MacPhail M; Sullivan AW; McWhinney CD; Vemulapalli KC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):115-120. PubMed ID: 31299257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy--results of the CLEVER study.
    Dik VK; Gralnek IM; Segol O; Suissa A; Belderbos TD; Moons LM; Segev M; Domanov S; Rex DK; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2015 Dec; 47(12):1151-8. PubMed ID: 26220283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-definition colonoscopy versus Endocuff versus EndoRings versus full-spectrum endoscopy for adenoma detection at colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Rex DK; Repici A; Gross SA; Hassan C; Ponugoti PL; Garcia JR; Broadley HM; Thygesen JC; Sullivan AW; Tippins WW; Main SA; Eckert GJ; Vemulapalli KC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):335-344.e2. PubMed ID: 29530353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of EndoRings on colon adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Facciorusso A; Mohan BP; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Feb; 36(2):337-343. PubMed ID: 33140884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopic cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study-DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT).
    Rameshshanker R; Tsiamoulos Z; Wilson A; Rajendran A; Bassett P; Tekkis P; Saunders BP
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Apr; 91(4):894-904.e1. PubMed ID: 31836474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 3D-printed cap with sideoptics for colonoscopy: a randomized ex vivo study.
    Walter BM; Hann A; Frank R; Meining A
    Endoscopy; 2017 Aug; 49(8):808-812. PubMed ID: 28445902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endocuff-assisted versus Cap-assisted Colonoscopy in Increasing Adenoma Detection Rate. A Meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Buccino VR; Sacco R
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2020 Sep; 29(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 32830810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cap-Assisted Chromoendoscopy Using a Mounted Cap Versus Standard Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection.
    Kim SY; Park HJ; Kim HS; Park DI; Cha JM; Park SJ; Choi H; Shin JE; Eun CS; Kim JO; Kim HG; Kim SE; Park CH; Kim TI; Hong SN
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 115(3):465-472. PubMed ID: 31972618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial.
    Bhattacharyya R; Chedgy F; Kandiah K; Fogg C; Higgins B; Haysom-Newport B; Gadeke L; Thursby-Pelham F; Ellis R; Goggin P; Longcroft-Wheaton G; Bhandari P
    Endoscopy; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 28614895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linked color imaging versus narrow-band imaging for colorectal polyp detection: a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study.
    Leung WK; Guo CG; Ko MKL; To EWP; Mak LY; Tong TSM; Chen LJ; But DYK; Wong SY; Liu KSH; Tsui V; Lam FYF; Lui TKL; Cheung KS; Lo SH; Hung IFN
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):104-112.e5. PubMed ID: 31276672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on detection of proximal colon adenomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Desai M; Sanchez-Yague A; Choudhary A; Pervez A; Gupta N; Vennalaganti P; Vennelaganti S; Fugazza A; Repici A; Hassan C; Sharma P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):274-281.e3. PubMed ID: 28365356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Colonoscopy attachments for the detection of precancerous lesions during colonoscopy: A review of the literature.
    Gkolfakis P; Tziatzios G; Spartalis E; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K
    World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Oct; 24(37):4243-4253. PubMed ID: 30310257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy.
    Imaeda H; Yamaoka M; Ohgo H; Soma H; Ashitani K; Miyaguchi K; Tsuzuki Y; Hosoe N; Nakamoto H
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1492-1496. PubMed ID: 31254485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
    DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic yield and miss rate of EndoRings in an organized colorectal cancer screening program: the SMART (Study Methodology for ADR-Related Technology) trial.
    Hassan C; Senore C; Manes G; Fuccio L; Iacopini F; Ricciardiello L; Anderloni A; Frazzoni L; Ballanti R; de Nucci G; Colussi D; Redaelli D; Lorenzetti R; Devani M; Arena I; Grossi C; Andrei F; Balestrazzi E; Sharma P; Rex DK; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):583-590.e1. PubMed ID: 30365984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.
    Dik VK; Moons LM; Siersema PD
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 20(9):2200-11. PubMed ID: 24605019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
    Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Del Prete V; Buccino RV; Della Valle N; Nacchiero MC; Monica F; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1209-1219.e9. PubMed ID: 29133257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of an Endoscopic Quality Improvement Program Focused on Adenoma Detection on Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection.
    Racho RG; Krishna M; Coe SG; Thomas CS; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB
    Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Jun; 62(6):1464-1471. PubMed ID: 28444509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Success, safety, and usefulness of right colon retroflexion for the detection of additional colonic lesions not visualized with standard frontal view.
    Nogales O; de la Maza J; Martos E; Carrión L; Borobia R; Lucendo L; López-Ibáñez M; García-Lledó J; Pérez-Carazo L; Merino B
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Feb; 35(2):620-625. PubMed ID: 32072275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.