These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31299257)
1. Impact of a ring-fitted cap on insertion time and adenoma detection: a randomized controlled trial. Rex DK; Kessler WR; Sagi SV; Rogers NA; Fischer M; Bohm ME; Wo JM; Dewitt JM; McHenry L; Lahr RE; Searight MP; MacPhail M; Sullivan AW; McWhinney CD; Vemulapalli KC Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):115-120. PubMed ID: 31299257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy--results of the CLEVER study. Dik VK; Gralnek IM; Segol O; Suissa A; Belderbos TD; Moons LM; Segev M; Domanov S; Rex DK; Siersema PD Endoscopy; 2015 Dec; 47(12):1151-8. PubMed ID: 26220283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-definition colonoscopy versus Endocuff versus EndoRings versus full-spectrum endoscopy for adenoma detection at colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized trial. Rex DK; Repici A; Gross SA; Hassan C; Ponugoti PL; Garcia JR; Broadley HM; Thygesen JC; Sullivan AW; Tippins WW; Main SA; Eckert GJ; Vemulapalli KC Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):335-344.e2. PubMed ID: 29530353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of EndoRings on colon adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Facciorusso A; Mohan BP; Crinò SF; Muscatiello N J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Feb; 36(2):337-343. PubMed ID: 33140884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study-DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT). Rameshshanker R; Tsiamoulos Z; Wilson A; Rajendran A; Bassett P; Tekkis P; Saunders BP Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Apr; 91(4):894-904.e1. PubMed ID: 31836474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 3D-printed cap with sideoptics for colonoscopy: a randomized ex vivo study. Walter BM; Hann A; Frank R; Meining A Endoscopy; 2017 Aug; 49(8):808-812. PubMed ID: 28445902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Endocuff-assisted versus Cap-assisted Colonoscopy in Increasing Adenoma Detection Rate. A Meta-analysis. Facciorusso A; Buccino VR; Sacco R J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2020 Sep; 29(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 32830810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cap-Assisted Chromoendoscopy Using a Mounted Cap Versus Standard Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection. Kim SY; Park HJ; Kim HS; Park DI; Cha JM; Park SJ; Choi H; Shin JE; Eun CS; Kim JO; Kim HG; Kim SE; Park CH; Kim TI; Hong SN Am J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 115(3):465-472. PubMed ID: 31972618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial. Bhattacharyya R; Chedgy F; Kandiah K; Fogg C; Higgins B; Haysom-Newport B; Gadeke L; Thursby-Pelham F; Ellis R; Goggin P; Longcroft-Wheaton G; Bhandari P Endoscopy; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 28614895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Linked color imaging versus narrow-band imaging for colorectal polyp detection: a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study. Leung WK; Guo CG; Ko MKL; To EWP; Mak LY; Tong TSM; Chen LJ; But DYK; Wong SY; Liu KSH; Tsui V; Lam FYF; Lui TKL; Cheung KS; Lo SH; Hung IFN Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jan; 91(1):104-112.e5. PubMed ID: 31276672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy on detection of proximal colon adenomas: systematic review and meta-analysis. Desai M; Sanchez-Yague A; Choudhary A; Pervez A; Gupta N; Vennalaganti P; Vennelaganti S; Fugazza A; Repici A; Hassan C; Sharma P Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Aug; 86(2):274-281.e3. PubMed ID: 28365356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colonoscopy attachments for the detection of precancerous lesions during colonoscopy: A review of the literature. Gkolfakis P; Tziatzios G; Spartalis E; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Oct; 24(37):4243-4253. PubMed ID: 30310257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy. Imaeda H; Yamaoka M; Ohgo H; Soma H; Ashitani K; Miyaguchi K; Tsuzuki Y; Hosoe N; Nakamoto H J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1492-1496. PubMed ID: 31254485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic yield and miss rate of EndoRings in an organized colorectal cancer screening program: the SMART (Study Methodology for ADR-Related Technology) trial. Hassan C; Senore C; Manes G; Fuccio L; Iacopini F; Ricciardiello L; Anderloni A; Frazzoni L; Ballanti R; de Nucci G; Colussi D; Redaelli D; Lorenzetti R; Devani M; Arena I; Grossi C; Andrei F; Balestrazzi E; Sharma P; Rex DK; Repici A Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):583-590.e1. PubMed ID: 30365984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy. Dik VK; Moons LM; Siersema PD World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 20(9):2200-11. PubMed ID: 24605019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos). Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis. Facciorusso A; Del Prete V; Buccino RV; Della Valle N; Nacchiero MC; Monica F; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1209-1219.e9. PubMed ID: 29133257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of an Endoscopic Quality Improvement Program Focused on Adenoma Detection on Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection. Racho RG; Krishna M; Coe SG; Thomas CS; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Jun; 62(6):1464-1471. PubMed ID: 28444509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Success, safety, and usefulness of right colon retroflexion for the detection of additional colonic lesions not visualized with standard frontal view. Nogales O; de la Maza J; Martos E; Carrión L; Borobia R; Lucendo L; López-Ibáñez M; García-Lledó J; Pérez-Carazo L; Merino B Surg Endosc; 2021 Feb; 35(2):620-625. PubMed ID: 32072275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]