BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31299326)

  • 21. A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation.
    Kaouk JH; Haber GP; Autorino R; Crouzet S; Ouzzane A; Flamand V; Villers A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1033-43. PubMed ID: 25041850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effective intracorporeal space in robot-assisted multiquadrant surgery in a pediatric inanimate model.
    Fernandez N; Barco-Castillo C; ElGhazzaoui A; Farhat W
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 32266666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is it the End for Urologic Pelvic Laparoscopic Surgery?
    Athanasiadis G; Bourdoumis A; Masood J
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Jun; 27(3):139-146. PubMed ID: 28582377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. EAU guidelines on robotic and single-site surgery in urology.
    Merseburger AS; Herrmann TR; Shariat SF; Kyriazis I; Nagele U; Traxer O; Liatsikos EN;
    Eur Urol; 2013 Aug; 64(2):277-91. PubMed ID: 23764016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contribution of laparoscopic training to robotic proficiency.
    Angell J; Gomez MS; Baig MM; Abaza R
    J Endourol; 2013 Aug; 27(8):1027-31. PubMed ID: 23527871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic surgery: new robots and finally some real competition!
    Rao PP
    World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):537-541. PubMed ID: 29427003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The added value of robotic surgery].
    Buffi NM; Lughezzani G; Lazzeri M; Casale P; Fiorini G; Hurle R; Taverna GL; Guazzoni G
    Urologia; 2015 Oct; 82 Suppl 1():S11-3. PubMed ID: 26429388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
    Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Future Platforms of Robotic Surgery.
    Alip SL; Kim J; Rha KH; Han WK
    Urol Clin North Am; 2022 Feb; 49(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 34776052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comprehensive Approach to Port Placement Templates for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Urologic Surgeries.
    Pathak RA; Patel M; Hemal AK
    J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1269-1276. PubMed ID: 28967280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Urologic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS): current status.
    Autorino R; Kim FJ
    Urologia; 2011; 78(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 21452159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
    Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL
    Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy (R-LESS-RP) with daVinci Single-Site® platform. Concept and evolution of the technique following an IDEAL phase 1.
    Gaboardi F; Pini G; Suardi N; Montorsi F; Passaretti G; Smelzo S
    J Robot Surg; 2019 Apr; 13(2):215-226. PubMed ID: 30019228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Initial experience with 3D vision laparoscopy and articulating shears.
    Abou-Haidar H; Al-Qaoud T; Jednak R; Brzezinski A; El-Sherbiny M; Capolicchio JP
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):426.e1-426.e5. PubMed ID: 27889223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
    Scheib SA; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgeries: A multicenter experience of 469 cases in Japan.
    Sato F; Nakagawa K; Kawauchi A; Matsubara A; Okegawa T; Habuchi T; Yoshimura K; Hoshi A; Kinoshita H; Miyajima A; Naitoh Y; Inoue S; Itaya N; Narita S; Hanai K; Okubo K; Yanishi M; Matsuda T; Terachi T; Mimata H
    Int J Urol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 27699877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Training in urological robotic surgery. Future perspectives.
    El Sherbiny A; Eissa A; Ghaith A; Morini E; Marzotta L; Sighinolfi MC; Micali S; Bianchi G; Rocco B
    Arch Esp Urol; 2018 Jan; 71(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 29336338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Future perspectives in robotic surgery.
    Wedmid A; Llukani E; Lee DI
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):1028-36. PubMed ID: 21917107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Current status of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urologic surgery.
    Oh TH
    Korean J Urol; 2012 Jul; 53(7):443-50. PubMed ID: 22866213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is robotics the future of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS)?
    Spana G; Rane A; Kaouk JH
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):1018-23. PubMed ID: 21917105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.