These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31299326)

  • 61. Single-port Robotic Pelvic Bulky Lymph Node Resection: A Case Report.
    Gungor M; Takmaz O; Afsar S; Ozbasli E; Gundogan S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1030-1031. PubMed ID: 27311875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. 30 Years of Robotic Surgery.
    Leal Ghezzi T; Campos Corleta O
    World J Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2550-7. PubMed ID: 27177648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Current status of robotic urologic surgery in Italy].
    Sacco E; Bientinesi R; Bassi PF
    Urologia; 2015 Oct; 82 Suppl 1():S8-10. PubMed ID: 26429391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Role of Robotics in Children: A brave New World!
    Spinoit AF; Nguyen H; Subramaniam R
    Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Apr; 3(2-3):172-180. PubMed ID: 28889938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. LESSons in minimally invasive urology.
    Dev H; Sooriakumaran P; Tewari A; Rane A
    BJU Int; 2011 May; 107(10):1555-9. PubMed ID: 20955267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures in urologic surgery in the USA.
    Sleeper J; Lotan Y
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2011 Jan; 8(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 21158544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Port Placement and Docking for Robotic Surgery: The University of Southern California Approach.
    Chopra S; Metcalfe C; de Castro Abreu AL; Azhar RA; Satkunasivam R; Desai M; Aron M; Gill I; Berger AK
    J Endourol; 2015 Aug; 29(8):868-72. PubMed ID: 25891537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Robot-assisted surgery and incisional hernia: a comparative study of ergonomics in a training model.
    Sánchez A; Rodríguez O; Jara G; Sánchez R; Vegas L; Rosciano J; Estrada L
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):523-527. PubMed ID: 29302848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) pyeloplasty using a new single-port platform.
    Cestari A; Buffi NM; Lista G; Lughezzani G; Larcher A; Lazzeri M; Sangalli M; Rigatti P; Guazzoni G
    Eur Urol; 2012 Jul; 62(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 22469392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Robot-assisted surgery: current status evaluation in abdominal and urological pediatric surgery.
    Chaussy Y; Becmeur F; Lardy H; Aubert D
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Jun; 23(6):530-8. PubMed ID: 23731080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Robotics in urologic surgery.
    Zhao LC; Meeks JJ; Nadler RB
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2009 Dec; 61(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19816386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Updates in Urologic Robot Assisted Surgery.
    Navaratnam A; Abdul-Muhsin H; Humphreys M
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():. PubMed ID: 30613380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Competing Robotic Systems: A Preview.
    Wilson M; Badani K
    Urol Clin North Am; 2021 Feb; 48(1):147-150. PubMed ID: 33218589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery.
    Aydin A; Raison N; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
    Nat Rev Urol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):503-19. PubMed ID: 27549358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Current status of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy.
    Komninos C; Tuliao P; Rha KH
    Int J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):954-9. PubMed ID: 25047133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Robotic Single-Port Platform in General, Urologic, and Gynecologic Surgeries: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis.
    Cianci S; Rosati A; Rumolo V; Gueli Alletti S; Gallotta V; Turco LC; Corrado G; Vizzielli G; Fagotti A; Fanfani F; Scambia G; Uccella S
    World J Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2401-2419. PubMed ID: 31187247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Robotically assisted urologic endoscopic surgery].
    Castillo O; Javier Ahualli C; Sánchez-Salas R; Vidal I; Campos R; Feria-Flores M; Sepúlveda F
    Arch Esp Urol; 2008 Sep; 61(7):809-14. PubMed ID: 18972916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Recent advances in urologic laparoscopic surgeries: laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, robotics and navigation.
    Matsuda T
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2013 May; 6(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 23601994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. 3D imaging applications for robotic urologic surgery: an ESUT YAUWP review.
    Checcucci E; Amparore D; Fiori C; Manfredi M; Ivano M; Di Dio M; Niculescu G; Piramide F; Cattaneo G; Piazzolla P; Cacciamani GE; Autorino R; Porpiglia F
    World J Urol; 2020 Apr; 38(4):869-881. PubMed ID: 31456017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.