BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31299946)

  • 1. Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension - in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations.
    Pedersen KD; Storkholm MH; Bek KM; Glavind-Kristensen M; Greisen S
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):96. PubMed ID: 31299946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
    Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
    Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of Manchester procedure combined with high uterosacral ligament suspension for uterine prolapse.
    Wang Q; Wu N; Li Y; Lin C; Xu Y; Chen X
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Apr; 49(4):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 36734101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair.
    Barba M; Cola A; Melocchi T; De Vicari D; Costa C; Volontè S; Sandullo L; Frigerio M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Feb; 60(2):. PubMed ID: 38399607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Long-term outcomes of the high vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension in treatment of the severe pelvic organ prolapse].
    Lu YX; Wang J; Shen WJ; Zhang YH; Liu JX; Zhao Y; Ge J; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 24199919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.
    Milani R; Frigerio M; Cola A; Beretta C; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(3):203-206. PubMed ID: 29697546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair.
    Milani R; Frigerio M; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1421-1423. PubMed ID: 28188468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effectiveness of vaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse].
    Shen WJ; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Duan L; Zhang YH; Niu K; Wang WY; Qin L; Zhang XL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 54(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 31006188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technique of extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for apical suspension.
    Ow LL; Walsh CE; Rajamaheswari N; Dwyer PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Apr; 27(4):637-9. PubMed ID: 26612207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
    Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
    JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy and Apical Suspension of the Vaginal Cuff to the Uterosacral Ligament.
    Lowenstein L; Baekelandt J; Paz Y; Lauterbach R; Matanes E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1015. PubMed ID: 30980991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups.
    Bradley MS; Bickhaus JA; Amundsen CL; Newcomb LK; Truong T; Weidner AC; Siddiqui NY
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(3):207-212. PubMed ID: 28657988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
    Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
    Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High uterosacral vault suspension vs Sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up.
    Rondini C; Braun H; Alvarez J; Urzúa MJ; Villegas R; Wenzel C; Descouvieres C
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1131-8. PubMed ID: 25910610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Initial experience from a tertiary care hospital.
    Alay I; Kaya C; Cengiz H; Yildiz S; Aslan O; Yasar L; Ekin M
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2021 Jul; 14(3):346-352. PubMed ID: 32967055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.