151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31300220)
1. Cost-effectiveness of pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: A pilot comparative analysis.
Garreffa E; Agrawal A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Oct; 72(10):1700-1738. PubMed ID: 31300220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix.
Bank J; Phillips NA; Park JE; Song DH
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Dec; 37(6):1194-201. PubMed ID: 24091489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thoracic Intercostal Nerve Blocks Reduce Opioid Consumption and Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Shah A; Rowlands M; Krishnan N; Patel A; Ott-Young A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Nov; 136(5):584e-591e. PubMed ID: 26505714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Evolving Role of Pre-pectoral ADM-assisted Approach in Implant-based Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Conservative Mastectomy: An Overview of the Literature and Description of Technique.
Wazir U; Mokbel K
In Vivo; 2018; 32(6):1477-1480. PubMed ID: 30348704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Silicone versus Saline Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using the BREAST-Q.
Siotos C; Sarmiento S; McColl M; Sacks JM; Manahan MA; Rosson GD; Cooney CM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Feb; 143(2):276e-284e. PubMed ID: 30489499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of Breast Animation Deformity in Implant-Based Reconstruction with Selective Nerve Ablation.
Eck DL; Nguyen DC; Barnes LL; Jansen DA
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 42(6):1472-1475. PubMed ID: 29959495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Longitudinal Assessment of Outcomes and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Immediate Breast Reconstruction-Comparing Implant- and Autologous-based Breast Reconstruction.
Fischer JP; Fox JP; Nelson JA; Kovach SJ; Serletti JM
Ann Surg; 2015 Oct; 262(4):692-9. PubMed ID: 26366550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-utility analysis of four common surgical treatment pathways for breast cancer.
Kouwenberg CAE; Mureau MAM; Kranenburg LW; Rakhorst H; de Leeuw D; Klem TMAL; Koppert LB; Ramos IC; Busschbach JJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jun; 47(6):1299-1308. PubMed ID: 33349523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility and Cost Effectiveness of Routine, Histologic Evaluation of the Mastectomy Scar in Two-Stage, Implant-Based Reconstruction during Expander-to-Implant Exchange.
Fishman JE; Pang JHY; Dabbs D; De La Cruz C
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Dec; 142(6):836e-839e. PubMed ID: 30489512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost analysis of pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
Chinta S; Koh DJ; Sobti N; Packowski K; Rosado N; Austen W; Jimenez RB; Specht M; Liao EC
Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17512. PubMed ID: 36266370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Autologous Breast Reconstruction versus Implant-Based Reconstruction: How Do Long-Term Costs and Health Care Use Compare?
Lemaine V; Schilz SR; Van Houten HK; Zhu L; Habermann EB; Boughey JC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):303-311. PubMed ID: 31985608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extended Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Pectoralis-Serratus Sling and Acellular Dermal Matrix.
Kolker AR; Piccolo PP
Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Apr; 37(4):485-491. PubMed ID: 28364524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mastectomy, nipple-areola preservation, and immediate implant reconstruction: are total and partial muscle coverage techniques aesthetically equivalent?
Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Dec; 126(6):319e-320e. PubMed ID: 21124113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps.
Tran BNN; Fadayomi A; Lin SJ; Singhal D; Lee BT
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):439-447. PubMed ID: 28591940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Ter Louw RP; Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Nov; 140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):51S-59S. PubMed ID: 29064922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cost of major complications associated with immediate two-stage expander/implant-based breast reconstruction.
Yan C; Fischer JP; Wes AM; Basta MN; Rohrbach JI; Kovach SJ; Serletti JM; Wu LC
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2015 Jun; 49(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 25529100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical Outcomes of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using TiLoop Bra Mesh Combined With Pectoralis Major Disconnection.
Chen G; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhu X; Liu C; Sun L; Gu X; Zhang H; Liu C
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 83(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 31524731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cost-utility analysis comparing large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery to mastectomy with single stage implant reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer.
Asban A; Homsy C; Chen L; Fisher C; Losken A; Chatterjee A
Breast; 2018 Oct; 41():159-164. PubMed ID: 30099327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct to implant breast reconstruction with biological acellular dermal matrices.
Teoh V; Gui G
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2020 Mar; 81(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 32240004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
