148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31300499)
1. Could changing invitation and booking processes help women translate their cervical screening intentions into action? A population-based survey of women's preferences in Great Britain.
Ryan M; Waller J; Marlow LA
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e028134. PubMed ID: 31300499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cluster randomised trial of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC).
Kitchener HC; Gittins M; Rivero-Arias O; Tsiachristas A; Cruickshank M; Gray A; Brabin L; Torgerson D; Crosbie EJ; Sargent A; Roberts C
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Sep; 20(68):1-138. PubMed ID: 27632816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision-making about cervical screening in a heterogeneous sample of nonparticipants: A qualitative interview study.
Marlow LAV; Chorley AJ; Rockliffe L; Waller J
Psychooncology; 2018 Oct; 27(10):2488-2493. PubMed ID: 30095862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.
Lilliecreutz C; Karlsson H; Spetz Holm AC
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235202. PubMed ID: 32614875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Barriers to cervical screening and interest in self-sampling among women who actively decline screening.
Bennett KF; Waller J; Chorley AJ; Ferrer RA; Haddrell JB; Marlow LA
J Med Screen; 2018 Dec; 25(4):211-217. PubMed ID: 29649936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.
Staley H; Shiraz A; Shreeve N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Gajjar K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Sep; 9(9):CD002834. PubMed ID: 34694000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Offering an app to book cervical screening appointments: A service evaluation.
Ryan M; Marlow L; Forster A; Ruwende J; Waller J
J Med Screen; 2020 Jun; 27(2):85-89. PubMed ID: 31500520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring the Preferences of Homeless Women for Cervical Cancer Screening Interventions: Development of a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.
Wittenberg E; Bharel M; Saada A; Santiago E; Bridges JF; Weinreb L
Patient; 2015 Oct; 8(5):455-67. PubMed ID: 25586646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acceptability and Feasibility of HPV Self-Sampling as an Alternative Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Under-Screened Population Groups: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Wong EL; Cheung AW; Wong AY; Chan PK
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32867315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's preferences and experiences of cervical cancer screening in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.
Majid U; Kandasamy S; Farrah K; Vanstone M
Rural Remote Health; 2019 Oct; 19(4):5190. PubMed ID: 31640391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women.
Marlow LAV; Chorley AJ; Haddrell J; Ferrer R; Waller J
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 80():30-38. PubMed ID: 28535495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's Behaviors Toward Mammogram and Pap Test: Opportunities to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Participation Rates among Older Women.
Tavasoli SM; Kane E; Chiarelli AM; Kupets R
Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 29174212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Australian women's cervical cancer screening attendance as a function of screening barriers and facilitators.
Brown RF; Muller TR; Olsen A
Soc Sci Med; 2019 Jan; 220():396-402. PubMed ID: 30529797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cluster randomized trial of strategies to increase uptake amongst young women invited for their first cervical screen: The STRATEGIC trial.
Kitchener H; Gittins M; Cruickshank M; Moseley C; Fletcher S; Albrow R; Gray A; Brabin L; Torgerson D; Crosbie EJ; Sargent A; Roberts C
J Med Screen; 2018 Jun; 25(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 28530513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Musa J; Achenbach CJ; O'Dwyer LC; Evans CT; McHugh M; Hou L; Simon MA; Murphy RL; Jordan N
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183924. PubMed ID: 28873092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing barriers to colorectal cancer screening with barriers to breast and cervical screening: a population-based survey of screening-age women in Great Britain.
Lo SH; Waller J; Wardle J; von Wagner C
J Med Screen; 2013 Jun; 20(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 23761420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What do young women below national screening age in England think about cervical cancer and cervical screening? A qualitative study.
Groves S; Brooks J
J Clin Nurs; 2022 Jun; 31(11-12):1588-1597. PubMed ID: 34418192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perspectives of non-attenders for cervical cancer screening in Norway: a qualitative focus group study.
Aasbø G; Solbrække KN; Waller J; Tropé A; Nygård M; Hansen BT
BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e029505. PubMed ID: 31471438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Racial and ethnic differences in cervical cancer screening barriers and intentions: The My Body My Test-3 HPV self-collection trial among under-screened, low-income women.
Zeno EE; Brewer NT; Spees LP; Des Marais AC; Sanusi BO; Hudgens MG; Jackson S; Barclay L; Wheeler SB; Smith JS
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0274974. PubMed ID: 36227948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Organised Versus Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban and Rural Regions of Lithuania.
Paulauskiene J; Ivanauskiene R; Skrodeniene E; Petkeviciene J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Sep; 55(9):. PubMed ID: 31500116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
