182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31300913)
1. Experiences and psychological outcomes of the oocyte donor: a survey of donors post-donation from one center.
Blakemore JK; Voigt P; Schiffman MR; Lee S; Besser AG; Fino ME
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Oct; 36(10):1999-2005. PubMed ID: 31300913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.
Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Suikkari AM; Söderström-Anttila V
Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 30805634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY
Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.
Lampic C; Skoog Svanberg A; Sydsjö G
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25030191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors.
Söderström-Anttila V; Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Poranen AK; Sälevaara M; Suikkari AM
Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):597-606. PubMed ID: 26724795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation.
Isaksson S; Sydsjö G; Skoog Svanberg A; Lampic C
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25123638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.
Isaksson S; Sydsjö G; Skoog Svanberg A; Lampic C
Hum Reprod; 2012 Oct; 27(10):2998-3007. PubMed ID: 22859508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Views of donors and recipients regarding disclosure to children following altruistic known oocyte donation.
Yee S; Blyth E; Tsang AK
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Dec; 23(7):851-9. PubMed ID: 22019613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation.
Laruelle C; Place I; Demeestere I; Englert Y; Delbaere A
Hum Reprod; 2011 Feb; 26(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 21149319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation.
Greenfeld DA; Mazure CM; Olive DL; Keefe DL
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Feb; 12(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 7670269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Views of French oocyte donors at least 3 years after donation.
Cordier C; Ducrocq B; Fry J; Catteau-Jonard S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Jun; 40(6):819-826. PubMed ID: 32295744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences.
Jordan CB; Belar CD; Williams RS
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jun; 25(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 15715037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes.
Baetens P; Devroey P; Camus M; Van Steirteghem AC; Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I
Hum Reprod; 2000 Feb; 15(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 10655327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation.
Kalfoglou AL; Geller G
Fertil Steril; 2000 Oct; 74(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 11020503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring motivations, attitudes and experiences of oocyte donors: A qualitative study.
Borgstrøm MB; Nygaard SS; Danielsen AK; Kesmodel US
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 30779111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychological adjustment in disclosing and non-disclosing heterosexual-couple families following conception with oocytes or spermatozoa from identity-release donors.
Widbom A; Sydsjö G; Lampic C
Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Nov; 45(5):1046-1053. PubMed ID: 35953415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rethinking gamete donor care: A satisfaction survey of egg and sperm donors in the UK.
Williams RA; Machin LL
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199971. PubMed ID: 30036373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survey report of gamete donors' and recipients' preferences regarding disclosure of third party reproduction outcomes and genetic risk information.
Lindheim SR; Porat N; Jaeger AS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Apr; 37(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 21349122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "They were my eggs; they were her babies": known oocyte donors' conceptualizations of their reproductive material.
Blyth E; Yee S; Tsang AK
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Nov; 33(11):1134-40. PubMed ID: 22082787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Young Women’s Attitudes Towards Modern Reproductive Practices: A Survey Study Assessing What Young Women Want.
Druckenmiller S; DeVore S; Knopman JM; Noyes N
J Reprod Med; 2017; 62(3-4):111-18. PubMed ID: 30230301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
