BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31300913)

  • 21. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons.
    Yee S; Hitkari JA; Greenblatt EM
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jul; 22(7):2040-50. PubMed ID: 17507386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Expectations and experiences of gamete donors and donor-conceived adults searching for genetic relatives using DNA linking through a voluntary register.
    van den Akker OB; Crawshaw MA; Blyth ED; Frith LJ
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jan; 30(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 25358347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Oocyte donors' comprehension as assessed by the EDICT (Egg Donor Informed Consent Tool).
    Skillern AA; Cedars MI; Huddleston HG
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):248-51. PubMed ID: 24140037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. "I want us to be a normal family": Toward an understanding of the functions of anonymity among U.S. oocyte donors and recipients.
    de Melo-Martín I; Rubin LR; Cholst IN
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(4):235-251. PubMed ID: 30398412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A survey of parental attitudes toward oocyte donation.
    Pettee D; Weckstein LN
    Hum Reprod; 1993 Nov; 8(11):1963-5. PubMed ID: 8288766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Pregnancy following anonymous oocyte donation: Experience and feelings].
    Guillou J; Séjourné N; Chabrol H
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 May; 37(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 19395302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychological aspects in anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation.
    Weil E; Cornet D; Sibony C; Mandelbaum J; Salat-Baroux J
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1344-7. PubMed ID: 7962446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Egg donation for stem cell research: ideas of surplus and deficit in Australian IVF patients' and reproductive donors' accounts.
    Waldby C; Carroll K
    Sociol Health Illn; 2012 May; 34(4):513-28. PubMed ID: 21951180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Disclosure decisions among known and anonymous oocyte donation recipients.
    Greenfeld DA; Klock SC
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jun; 81(6):1565-71. PubMed ID: 15193478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attitudes and intentions towards volunteer oocyte donation.
    Purewal S; van den Akker OB
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2009; 19 Suppl 1():19-26. PubMed ID: 19622246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Once you're choosing, nobody's perfect: is more information necessarily better in oocyte donor selection?
    Rubin LR; de Melo-Martin I; Rosenwaks Z; Cholst IN
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Mar; 30(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25596906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Egg sharing and egg donation: attitudes of British egg donors and recipients.
    Ahuja KK; Mostyn BJ; Simons EG
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Dec; 12(12):2845-52. PubMed ID: 9455866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perspectives, experiences, and choices of parents of children conceived following oocyte donation.
    Blyth E; Kramer W; Schneider J
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Feb; 26(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 23265960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle.
    Kenney NJ; McGowan ML
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 19022427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Compensating human subjects providing oocytes for stem cell research: 9-year experience and outcomes.
    Zakarin Safier L; Gumer A; Kline M; Egli D; Sauer MV
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jul; 35(7):1219-1225. PubMed ID: 29872942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surrogacy families headed by gay men: relationships with surrogates and egg donors, fathers' decisions over disclosure and children's views on their surrogacy origins.
    Carone N; Baiocco R; Manzi D; Antoniucci C; Caricato V; Pagliarulo E; Lingiardi V
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):248-257. PubMed ID: 29237004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A survey of anonymous oocyte donors: demographics.
    Kan AK; Abdalla HI; Ogunyemi BO; Korea L; Latarche E
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Oct; 13(1O):2762-6. PubMed ID: 9804227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Psychological characteristics and factors related to willingness to donate again among anonymous oocyte donors.
    Klock SC; Stout JE; Davidson M
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Jun; 79(6):1312-6. PubMed ID: 12798876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
    Westlander G; Janson PO; Tägnfors U; Bergh C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term follow-up of mental health and satisfaction in a Swedish sample of sperm and egg donors after open-identity donation.
    Sydsjö G; Lampic C; Bladh M; Nedstrand E; Svanberg AS
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Dec; 47(6):103417. PubMed ID: 37931369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.