182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31300913)
41. Can we improve recruitment of oocyte donors with loss of donor anonymity? A hospital-based survey.
Brett S; Sacranie RR; Thomas GE; Rajkhowa R
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2008 Jun; 11(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 18569065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Attitude towards reciprocity as a motive for oocyte donation.
Pennings G; Ravel C; Girard JM; Domin-Bernhard M; Provoost V
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():194-198. PubMed ID: 29734085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?
Isaksson S; Skoog Svanberg A; Sydsjö G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Karlström PO; Solensten NG; Lampic C
Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):853-60. PubMed ID: 21212053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Exploring ovum donors' motivations and needs.
Braverman AM
Am J Bioeth; 2001; 1(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 11954623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Follow-up study of Finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation.
Söderström-Anttila V
Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):3073-6. PubMed ID: 8747077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Emerging Views of Kinships Created Through Oocyte Donation.
Hershberger PE; Driessnack M; Kavanaugh K; Klock SC
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2020; 45(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 31687982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The acceptability of posthumous human ovarian tissue donation in Utah.
Mizukami A; Peterson CM; Huang I; Cook C; Boyack LM; Emery BR; Carrell DT
Hum Reprod; 2005 Dec; 20(12):3560-5. PubMed ID: 16155082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A follow-up study of the long-term satisfaction, reproductive experiences, and self-reported health status of oocyte donors in Spain.
Gonzalo J; Perul M; Corral M; Caballero M; Conti C; García D; Vassena R; Rodríguez A
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Jun; 24(3):227-232. PubMed ID: 30958043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of attitudes of donors and recipients to oocyte donation.
Kirkland A; Power M; Burton G; Baber R; Studd J; Abdalla H
Hum Reprod; 1992 Mar; 7(3):355-7. PubMed ID: 1587942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Sperm and oocyte donors' experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring.
Jadva V; Freeman T; Kramer W; Golombok S
Hum Reprod; 2011 Mar; 26(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 21177310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Perception of pain and the oocyte donor experience: a retrospective analysis of commercial US donors.
Combs A; Kimes MJ; Jaslow CR; Hayes H; O'Leary LB; Levy MJ; Kutteh WH
Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Nov; 45(5):906-912. PubMed ID: 36058796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Preliminary study on the experience of egg donors at the CHRU in Tours: Key features for future research].
Cormery E; Frapsauce C; Malmanche H
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):366-373. PubMed ID: 32035169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Emotional and relational aspects of egg-sharing: egg-share donors' and recipients' feelings about each other, each others' treatment outcome and any resulting children.
Gürtin ZB; Ahuja KK; Golombok S
Hum Reprod; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1690-701. PubMed ID: 22434851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.
Svanberg AS; Sydsjö G; Bladh M; Lampic C
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Public support for intergenerational oocyte donation in the United States.
Bortoletto P; Farland LV; Ginsburg ES; Goldman RH
Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):343-348.e1. PubMed ID: 29246558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences.
Purewal S; van den Akker OB
Hum Reprod Update; 2009; 15(5):499-515. PubMed ID: 19443709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Follow-up assessment of excluded oocyte donor candidates.
Zweifel JE; Biaggio B; Schouweiler C; Lindheim SR
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Apr; 35(2):320-5. PubMed ID: 19335798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Psychosocial consequences of oocyte donation in donors: A systematic review.
Adib Moghaddam E; Kazemi A; Kheirabadi G; Ahmadi SM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():28-35. PubMed ID: 34689024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study.
Hershberger P; Klock SC; Barnes RB
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 17094982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample.
Skoog Svanberg A; Lampic C; Gejerwall AL; Gudmundsson J; Karlström PO; Solensten NG; Sydsjö G
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Sep; 92(9):1049-56. PubMed ID: 23611727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
