These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31301351)

  • 1. Disentangling the effects of reward value and probability on anticipatory event-related potentials.
    Schutte I; Heitland I; Kenemans JL
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Sep; 132():107138. PubMed ID: 31301351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dopaminergic and noradrenergic manipulation of anticipatory reward and probability event-related potentials.
    Schutte I; Deschamps PKH; van Harten PN; Kenemans JL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2020 Jul; 237(7):2019-2030. PubMed ID: 32313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When the outcome is different than expected: Subjective expectancy shapes reward prediction error at the FRN level.
    Walentowska W; Severo MC; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13456. PubMed ID: 31403188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of the global/local probability effect on the neural processing of cues and targets. A functional systems approach.
    Arjona A; Rodríguez E; Morales M; Gómez CM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():52-61. PubMed ID: 30342061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task.
    Krugliakova E; Klucharev V; Fedele T; Gorin A; Kuznetsova A; Shestakova A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 29196772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relevance and uncertainty jointly influence reward anticipation at the level of the SPN ERP component.
    Walentowska W; Paul K; Severo MC; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):287-297. PubMed ID: 29129655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reward contingencies and the recalibration of task monitoring and reward systems: a high-density electrical mapping study.
    Morie KP; De Sanctis P; Foxe JJ
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jul; 273():100-17. PubMed ID: 24836852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinct electrophysiological correlates between expected reward and risk processing.
    Zheng Y; An T; Li Q; Xu J
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Oct; 57(10):e13638. PubMed ID: 32672877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contextual novelty modulates the neural dynamics of reward anticipation.
    Bunzeck N; Guitart-Masip M; Dolan RJ; Düzel E
    J Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 31(36):12816-22. PubMed ID: 21900560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential modulations of reward expectation on implicit facial emotion processing: ERP evidence.
    Wu L; Müller HJ; Zhou X; Wei P
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Mar; 56(3):e13304. PubMed ID: 30443953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Teasing apart the anticipatory and consummatory processing of monetary incentives: An event-related potential study of reward dynamics.
    Novak KD; Foti D
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1470-82. PubMed ID: 26223291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of target probability on pre-stimulus brain activity.
    Lucci G; Berchicci M; Perri RL; Spinelli D; Di Russo F
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():121-8. PubMed ID: 26912279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decomposing the effort paradox in reward processing: Time matters.
    Yi W; Mei S; Zhang M; Zheng Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107311. PubMed ID: 31862207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute stress impairs reward positivity effect in probabilistic learning.
    Zhang X; Li P; Chen J; Li H
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13531. PubMed ID: 31953853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Processing of expected and unexpected monetary performance outcomes in healthy older subjects.
    Bellebaum C; Kobza S; Thiele S; Daum I
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 125(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 21280937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shifts in attentional scope modulate event-related potentials evoked by reward.
    Nadig A; Kelley NJ; Pornpattananangkul N; Glazer JE; Nusslock R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Jun; 19(3):586-599. PubMed ID: 30859386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectancy-related modulations of neural oscillations in continuous performance tasks.
    Bickel S; Dias EC; Epstein ML; Javitt DC
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):1867-76. PubMed ID: 22691613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transient and sustained ERP activity related to feedback processing in the probabilistic selection task.
    West R; Bailey K; Anderson S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():1-12. PubMed ID: 29499240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reward expectation modulates N2pc for target selection: Electrophysiological evidence.
    Wei P; Ji L
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Aug; 58(8):e13837. PubMed ID: 33931867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acute psychological stress promotes general alertness and attentional control processes: An ERP study.
    Qi M; Gao H
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13521. PubMed ID: 31898811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.