BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31301792)

  • 21. Ionising radiation awareness among resident doctors, interns, and radiographers in a university hospital emergency department.
    Günalp M; Gülünay B; Polat O; Demirkan A; Gürler S; Akkaş M; Aksu NM
    Radiol Med; 2014 Jun; 119(6):440-7. PubMed ID: 24356945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Exploring the reliability of the exposure index with a range of kV and mAs values: An experimental study.
    van Schoonhoven MT; Hayre DCM; England DA
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Dec; 52(4):559-566. PubMed ID: 34602372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiographers' involvement in research activities and opinions on radiography research: A Nordic survey.
    Saukko E; Andersson BT; Bolejko A; Debess J; Fridell K; Henner A; Mussmann BR; Sanderud A
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):867-872. PubMed ID: 33640279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation.
    Nol J; Isouard G; Mirecki J
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16421768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiographers' Ability to Detect Low-Contrast Detail in Digital Radiography Systems.
    Alsleem H; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 87(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 26377266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acceptability of a new practice development for radiographers focussed on reducing 'never events' related to nasogastric feeding tubes in adult patients.
    Roe G; Lambie H; Hood A; Tolan D
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Aug; 25(3):235-240. PubMed ID: 31301781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FEASIBILITY OF DISPLAYED EXPOSURE INDEX IN IEC STANDARD FRAMEWORK AS A DOSE OPTIMISATION TOOL FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Tanaka N; Kim J; Kim J; Morishita J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(3):384-394. PubMed ID: 32364600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Response letter to the editor- ref 'Radiographer knowledge and practice of paediatric radiation dose protocols in digital radiography in Gauteng'.
    Moolman N; Mulla F; Mdletshe S
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):e315-e316. PubMed ID: 32768326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implementation of a patient dose monitoring system in conventional digital X-ray imaging: initial experiences.
    Heilmaier C; Zuber N; Weishaupt D
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1021-1031. PubMed ID: 27339438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Letter to the Editor- Ref "Radiographer knowledge and practice of pediatric radiation dose protocols in digital radiography in Gauteng" by Moolman, Mulla and Mdletshe.
    Rusandu A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):183. PubMed ID: 32052746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiation awareness among dentists, radiographers and students.
    Furmaniak KZ; Kołodziejska MA; Szopiński KT
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016 Oct; 45(8):20160097. PubMed ID: 27404052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Use of Digital Side Markers (DSMs) and Cropping in Digital Radiography.
    Hayre CM; Blackman S; Eyden A; Carlton K
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):234-242. PubMed ID: 31176431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Knowledge and practice of computed tomography exposure parameters amongst radiographers in Jordan.
    Rawashdeh M; McEntee MF; Zaitoun M; Abdelrahman M; Brennan P; Alewaidat H; Lewis S; Saade C
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Nov; 102():132-137. PubMed ID: 30278337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic radiographers' perceptions of professional identity in Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
    Mtombeni K; Hazell L; Mokoena L
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2024 Mar; 71(1):142-149. PubMed ID: 37950360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Knowledge and utilisation of information and communication technology among radiographers in a lower-middle-income country.
    Weerakoon BS; Chandrasiri NR
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jan; 29(1):227-233. PubMed ID: 36608376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. New exposure indicators for digital radiography simplified for radiologists and technologists.
    Don S; Whiting BR; Rutz LJ; Apgar BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1337-41. PubMed ID: 23169727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Establishing Standardized Terminology for Digital Image Analysis: A Pilot Study.
    Balac V; Stewart K; Griswold R; Carlton R; Adler A
    Radiol Technol; 2020 Nov; 92(2):126-134. PubMed ID: 33203769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
    Tanaka R; Takamori M; Uchiyama Y; Nishikawa RM; Shiraishi J
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140565. PubMed ID: 25536443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.