171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31301794)
1. Scoliosis imaging: An analysis of radiation risk in the CT scan projection radiograph and a comparison with projection radiography and EOS.
Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
Radiography (Lond); 2019 Aug; 25(3):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 31301794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of Cobb angle measurement on CT scan projection radiograph images.
Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e73-e77. PubMed ID: 32052770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Organ doses and lifetime attributable risk evaluations for scoliosis examinations of adolescent patients with the EOS imaging system.
Branchini M; Del Vecchio A; Gigliotti CR; Loria A; Zerbi A; Calandrino R
Radiol Med; 2018 Apr; 123(4):305-313. PubMed ID: 29164365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cumulative effective dose and cancer risk from repetitive full spine imaging using EOS system: Impact to adolescent patients of different populations.
Law M; Ma WK; Chan E; Lau D; Mui C; Cheung K; Yip L; Lam W
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():1-5. PubMed ID: 29103466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A reduced micro-dose protocol for 3D reconstruction of the spine in children with scoliosis: results of a phantom-based and clinically validated study using stereo-radiography.
Pedersen PH; Vergari C; Alzakri A; Vialle R; Skalli W
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1874-1881. PubMed ID: 30350165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cumulative effective dose and cancer risk for pediatric population in repetitive full spine follow-up imaging: How micro dose is the EOS microdose protocol?
Law M; Ma WK; Lau D; Cheung K; Ip J; Yip L; Lam W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():87-91. PubMed ID: 29571807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulative Radiation Exposure With EOS Imaging Compared With Standard Spine Radiographs.
Luo TD; Stans AA; Schueler BA; Larson AN
Spine Deform; 2015 Mar; 3(2):144-150. PubMed ID: 27927305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation dose of digital radiography (DR) versus micro-dose x-ray (EOS) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2016 SOSORT- IRSSD "John Sevastic Award" Winner in Imaging Research.
Hui SC; Pialasse JP; Wong JY; Lam TP; Ng BK; Cheng JC; Chu WC
Scoliosis Spinal Disord; 2016; 11():46. PubMed ID: 28035336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultra-high pitch chest computed tomography at 70 kVp tube voltage in an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom and non-sedated pediatric patients: Initial experience with 3
Hagelstein C; Henzler T; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Weis M
Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 26702762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spinal phantom comparability study of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using digital radiographic imaging.
Chung N; Cheng YH; Po HL; Ng WK; Cheung KC; Yung HY; Lai YM
J Orthop Translat; 2018 Oct; 15():81-90. PubMed ID: 30533384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of added fat on the accuracy of Cobb angle measurements in CT SPR images: A phantom study.
Alrehily F; Alanezi A; Alsady G; Benqlilou M; Carlos L; Smit C; Snetler L; Coward J
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S88-S93. PubMed ID: 32340911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and validation of a bespoke phantom to test accuracy of Cobb angle measurements.
Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e78-e87. PubMed ID: 32052769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of rib cage parameters from 3-Dimensional reconstruction images obtained using simultaneous biplanar radiographic scanning technique in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Comparison with conventional computed tomography.
Machino M; Kawakami N; Ohara T; Saito T; Tauchi R; Imagama S
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 May; 75():94-98. PubMed ID: 32178993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EOS Micro-dose Protocol: First Full-spine Radiation Dose Measurements in Anthropomorphic Phantoms and Comparisons with EOS Standard-dose and Conventional Digital Radiology.
Pedersen PH; Petersen AG; Østgaard SE; Tvedebrink T; Eiskjær SP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):E1313-E1321. PubMed ID: 30383725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual-energy compared to single-energy CT in pediatric imaging: a phantom study for DECT clinical guidance.
Zhu X; McCullough WP; Mecca P; Servaes S; Darge K
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Nov; 46(12):1671-1679. PubMed ID: 27518078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Nano-Dose Protocol For Cobb Angle Assessment in Children With Scoliosis: Results of a Phantom-based and Clinically Validated Study.
Pedersen PH; Vergari C; Tran A; Xavier F; Jaeger A; Laboudie P; Housset V; Eiskjær SP; Vialle R
Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Aug; 32(7):E340-E345. PubMed ID: 31162186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of radiation exposure during radiography for scoliosis.
Gray JE; Hoffman AD; Peterson HA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1983 Jan; 65(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 6848535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New EOS Imaging Protocol Allows a Substantial Reduction in Radiation Exposure for Scoliosis Patients.
Newton PO; Khandwala Y; Bartley CE; Reighard FG; Bastrom TP; Yaszay B
Spine Deform; 2016 Mar; 4(2):138-144. PubMed ID: 27927546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images.
Wang J; Christner JA; Duan X; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6772-8. PubMed ID: 23127071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
