These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31301889)

  • 21. Beef flavor: a review from chemistry to consumer.
    Kerth CR; Miller RK
    J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Nov; 95(14):2783-98. PubMed ID: 25857365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tetraplex PCR assay involving double gene-sites discriminates beef and buffalo in Malaysian meat curry and burger products.
    Hossain MA; Ali ME; Hamid SB; Hossain SM; Asing ; Nizar NN; Uddin MN; Ali L; Asaduzzaman M; Akanda MJ
    Food Chem; 2017 Jun; 224():97-104. PubMed ID: 28159299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Beef quality attributes: A systematic review of consumer perspectives.
    Henchion MM; McCarthy M; Resconi VC
    Meat Sci; 2017 Jun; 128():1-7. PubMed ID: 28160662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?
    Strydom P; Burrow H; Polkinghorne R; Thompson J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():122-130. PubMed ID: 30677552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Identifying consumer preferences for specific beef flavor characteristics in relation to cattle production and postmortem processing parameters.
    O'Quinn TG; Woerner DR; Engle TE; Chapman PL; Legako JF; Brooks JC; Belk KE; Tatum JD
    Meat Sci; 2016 Feb; 112():90-102. PubMed ID: 26560806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis.
    Meyerding SGH; Gentz M; Altmann B; Meier-Dinkel L
    Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():324-333. PubMed ID: 29792892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes.
    Merlino VM; Borra D; Girgenti V; Dal Vecchio A; Massaglia S
    Meat Sci; 2018 Sep; 143():119-128. PubMed ID: 29738962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identification and quantification of flavor attributes present in chicken, lamb, pork, beef, and turkey.
    Maughan C; Martini S
    J Food Sci; 2012 Feb; 77(2):S115-21. PubMed ID: 22339550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top round steak.
    Neely TR; Lorenzen CL; Miller RK; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Taylor JF; Buyck MJ; Reagan JO; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):653-60. PubMed ID: 10229361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consumer assessment of beef strip loin steaks of varying fat levels.
    O'Quinn TG; Brooks JC; Polkinghorne RJ; Garmyn AJ; Johnson BJ; Starkey JD; Rathmann RJ; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):626-34. PubMed ID: 21948609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of branding on consumer palatability ratings of beef strip loin steaks.
    Wilfong AK; McKillip KV; Gonzalez JM; Houser TA; Unruh JA; Boyle EA; O'Quinn TG
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4930-4942. PubMed ID: 27898970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. International red meat trade.
    Brester GW; Marsh JM; Plain RL
    Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2003 Jul; 19(2):493-518. PubMed ID: 12951744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Consumer Response to Mechanically Tenderized Beef (MTB) and MTB Labels: An Exploratory Focus Group Study.
    Yang LL; Khalid ML; Duong MD; Kessinger JB; Ong BN; Drape TA; Williams RC; Archibald T; Chapman BJ; Boyer RR
    J Food Prot; 2019 Sep; 82(9):1484-1495. PubMed ID: 31411508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Beef customer satisfaction: cooking method and degree of doneness effects on the top sirloin steak.
    Savell JW; Lorenzen CL; Neely TR; Miller RK; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Taylor JF; Buyck MJ; Reagan JO
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 10229360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of quality labels on the formation of preferences of lamb meat consumers. A Spanish case study.
    Bernabéu R; Rabadán A; El Orche NE; Díaz M
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():129-133. PubMed ID: 28968556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consumer sensory evaluation and chemical composition of beef gluteus medius and triceps brachii steaks from cattle finished on forage or concentrate diets.
    Chail A; Legako JF; Pitcher LR; Ward RE; Martini S; MacAdam JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1553-1564. PubMed ID: 28464115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Capturing consumer value and clustering customer preferences in the Indonesian halal beef market.
    Mahbubi A; Uchiyama T; Hatanaka K
    Meat Sci; 2019 Oct; 156():23-32. PubMed ID: 31125944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Regional, socioeconomic and behavioural- impacts on consumer acceptability of beef in Northern Ireland, Republic of Ireland and Great Britain.
    Chong FS; Farmer LJ; Hagan TDJ; Speers JS; Sanderson DW; Devlin DJ; Tollerton IJ; Gordon AW; Methven L; Moloney AP; Kerry JP; O'Sullivan MG
    Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():86-95. PubMed ID: 31022586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
    Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How Consumers in the UK and Spain Value the Coexistence of the Claims Low Fat, Local, Organic and Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
    Akaichi F; Revoredo Giha C; Glenk K; Gil JM
    Nutrients; 2020 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.