240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31301914)
1. Hybrid Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty Showed Improved Survival Over Cemented and Uncemented Fixation: A Single-Center Survival Analysis of 2156 Hips at 12-18 Years.
Fowler AK; Gray AR; Gwynne-Jones DP
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2711-2717. PubMed ID: 31301914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cemented or uncemented acetabular fixation in combination with the Exeter Universal cemented stem.
Gwynne-Jones DP; Gray AR
Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):414-422. PubMed ID: 32228075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
Kubinec V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.
Wechter J; Comfort TK; Tatman P; Mehle S; Gioe TJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3588-95. PubMed ID: 23873609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Hailer NP; Garellick G; Kärrholm J
Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 20180715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A comparative study on short-term effectiveness between cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of femoral head after renal transplantation].
Yu L; Qi C; Yu T; Meng Q; Zhao X; Liu K; Cai Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(12):1409-13. PubMed ID: 24640354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Kremers HM; Howard JL; Loechler Y; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e82. PubMed ID: 22717834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Stringer M; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 19336803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Despite Improved Survivorship of Uncemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis, Cemented Fixation Remains the Gold Standard: An Analysis of a National Joint Registry.
Nugent M; Wyatt MC; Frampton CM; Hooper GJ
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1626-1633. PubMed ID: 31031155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing modern uncemented, hybrid and cemented implant combinations in older patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, a New Zealand Joint Registry study.
Boyle AB; Zhu M; Frampton C; Poutawera V; Vane A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jun; 143(6):3597-3604. PubMed ID: 36102955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component.
Pallaver A; Zwicky L; Bolliger L; Bösebeck H; Manzoni I; Schädelin S; Ochsner PE; Clauss M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Nov; 138(11):1609-1616. PubMed ID: 30099575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Tyson Y; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J; Hailer NP; Mohaddes M
Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):421-426. PubMed ID: 31154890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing uncemented, hybrid and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in young patients, a New Zealand Joint Registry study.
Boyle AB; Zhu M; Frampton C; Vane A; Poutawera V
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Sep; 142(9):2371-2380. PubMed ID: 34319471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.
Hannouche D; Devriese F; Delambre J; Zadegan F; Tourabaly I; Sedel L; Chevret S; Nizard R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 26341897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women - data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Dale H; Børsheim S; Kristensen TB; Fenstad AM; Gjertsen JE; Hallan G; Lie SA; Furnes O
Acta Orthop; 2020 Feb; 91(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 31663413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between fixation technique and revision risk in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 55 years of age. Results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.
Pedersen AB; Mehnert F; Havelin LI; Furnes O; Herberts P; Kärrholm J; Garellick G; Mäkela K; Eskelinen A; Overgaard S
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2014 May; 22(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 24631923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should patient age thresholds dictate fixation strategy in total hip arthroplasty?
Bloch BV; White JJE; Matar HE; Berber R; Manktelow ARJ
Bone Joint J; 2022 Feb; 104-B(2):206-211. PubMed ID: 35094580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Desy NM; Johnson JD; Sierra RJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):494-498. PubMed ID: 27600303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
