326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31302202)
21. [Biases on community structure during DNA extraction of shrimp intestinal microbiota revealed by high-throughput sequencing].
Wen C; He Y; Xue M; Liang H; Dong J
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2016 Jan; 56(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 27305787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Combined bacterial and fungal intestinal microbiota analyses: Impact of storage conditions and DNA extraction protocols.
Angebault C; Ghozlane A; Volant S; Botterel F; d'Enfert C; Bougnoux ME
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201174. PubMed ID: 30074988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is Minor.
Rintala A; Pietilä S; Munukka E; Eerola E; Pursiheimo JP; Laiho A; Pekkala S; Huovinen P
J Biomol Tech; 2017 Apr; 28(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 28260999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.
Al KF; Bisanz JE; Gloor GB; Reid G; Burton JP
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():117-121. PubMed ID: 29155236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantifying technical confounders in microbiome studies.
Bartolomaeus TUP; Birkner T; Bartolomaeus H; Löber U; Avery EG; Mähler A; Weber D; Kochlik B; Balogh A; Wilck N; Boschmann M; Müller DN; Markó L; Forslund SK
Cardiovasc Res; 2021 Feb; 117(3):863-875. PubMed ID: 32374853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of four DNA extraction methods for 16s rRNA microbiota profiling of human faecal samples.
Sinclair J; West NP; Cox AJ
BMC Res Notes; 2023 Aug; 16(1):169. PubMed ID: 37568179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance comparison of fecal preservative and stock solutions for gut microbiome storage at room temperature.
Park C; Yun KE; Chu JM; Lee JY; Hong CP; Nam YD; Jeong J; Han K; Ahn YJ
J Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 58(8):703-710. PubMed ID: 32583287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimisation of sample storage and DNA extraction for human gut microbiota studies.
Kazantseva J; Malv E; Kaleda A; Kallastu A; Meikas A
BMC Microbiol; 2021 May; 21(1):158. PubMed ID: 34051731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Human faecal collection methods demonstrate a bias in microbiome composition by cell wall structure.
Watson EJ; Giles J; Scherer BL; Blatchford P
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16831. PubMed ID: 31727963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-term stability of microbiome diversity and composition in fecal samples stored in eNAT medium.
Young RR; Jenkins K; Araujo-Perez F; Seed PC; Kelly MS
Microbiologyopen; 2020 Jul; 9(7):e1046. PubMed ID: 32390344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies.
Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Reliability of stool microbiome methods for DNA yields and sequencing among infants and young children.
Antosca K; Hoen AG; Palys T; Hilliard M; Morrison HG; Coker M; Madan J; Karagas MR
Microbiologyopen; 2020 May; 9(5):e1018. PubMed ID: 32166902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. VMG II transport medium stabilises oral microbiome samples for Next-Generation Sequencing.
Adler CJ; White A; Bockmann M; Browne GV; Townsend G; Hughes T
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():91-98. PubMed ID: 29155022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A novel affordable reagent for room temperature storage and transport of fecal samples for metagenomic analyses.
Han M; Hao L; Lin Y; Li F; Wang J; Yang H; Xiao L; Kristiansen K; Jia H; Li J
Microbiome; 2018 Feb; 6(1):43. PubMed ID: 29482661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of DNA extraction methodology on gut microbiota research applications.
Gerasimidis K; Bertz M; Quince C; Brunner K; Bruce A; Combet E; Calus S; Loman N; Ijaz UZ
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jul; 9():365. PubMed ID: 27456340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating gut microbiota profiles from archived fecal samples.
Rounge TB; Meisal R; Nordby JI; Ambur OH; de Lange T; Hoff G
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 30409123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of Specimen Collection Methodologies and Storage Conditions on the Short-Term Stability of Oral Microbiome Taxonomy.
Luo T; Srinivasan U; Ramadugu K; Shedden KA; Neiswanger K; Trumble E; Li JJ; McNeil DW; Crout RJ; Weyant RJ; Marazita ML; Foxman B
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 82(18):5519-29. PubMed ID: 27371581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
