These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31302205)

  • 1. A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs. electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews.
    Li T; Saldanha IJ; Jap J; Smith BT; Canner J; Hutfless SM; Branch V; Carini S; Chan W; de Bruijn B; Wallace BC; Walsh SA; Whamond EJ; Murad MH; Sim I; Berlin JA; Lau J; Dickersin K; Schmid CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():77-89. PubMed ID: 31302205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Saldanha IJ; Schmid CH; Lau J; Dickersin K; Berlin JA; Jap J; Smith BT; Carini S; Chan W; De Bruijn B; Wallace BC; Hutfless SM; Sim I; Murad MH; Walsh SA; Whamond EJ; Li T
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):196. PubMed ID: 27876082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Features and functioning of Data Abstraction Assistant, a software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews.
    Jap J; Saldanha IJ; Smith BT; Lau J; Schmid CH; Li T;
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 30325115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjudication rather than experience of data abstraction matters more in reducing errors in abstracting data in systematic reviews.
    E JY; Saldanha IJ; Canner J; Schmid CH; Le JT; Li T
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 31955502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review.
    Robson RC; Pham B; Hwee J; Thomas SM; Rios P; Page MJ; Tricco AC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():121-135. PubMed ID: 30312656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial.
    Gartlehner G; Affengruber L; Titscher V; Noel-Storr A; Dooley G; Ballarini N; König F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():20-28. PubMed ID: 31972274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated Data Abstraction of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Process Measures for Complete Episodes of Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation.
    Lin S; Turgulov A; Taher A; Buick JE; Byers A; Drennan IR; Hu S; J Morrison L
    Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1178-1181. PubMed ID: 27320008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews.
    Wang Z; Nayfeh T; Tetzlaff J; O'Blenis P; Murad MH
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227742. PubMed ID: 31935267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Researching the Appropriateness of Care in the Complementary and Integrative Health Professions Part 5: Using Patient Records: Selection, Protection, and Abstraction.
    Roth CP; Coulter ID; Kraus LS; Ryan GW; Jacob G; Marks JS; Hurwitz EL; Vernon H; Shekelle PG; Herman PM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2019 Jun; 42(5):327-334. PubMed ID: 31257004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review.
    Waffenschmidt S; Knelangen M; Sieben W; Bühn S; Pieper D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):132. PubMed ID: 31253092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Training as an Intervention to Decrease Medical Record Abstraction Errors Multicenter Studies.
    Zozus MN; Young LW; Simon AE; Garza M; Lawrence L; Ounpraseuth ST; Bledsoe M; Newman-Norlund S; Jarvis JD; McNally M; Harris KR; McCulloh R; Aikman R; Cox S; Malloch L; Walden A; Snowden J; Chedjieu IM; Wicker CA; Atkins L; Devlin LA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019; 257():526-539. PubMed ID: 30741251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategies of testing for syphilis during pregnancy.
    Shahrook S; Mori R; Ochirbat T; Gomi H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD010385. PubMed ID: 25352226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process.
    Lindgren BM; Lundman B; Graneheim UH
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Aug; 108():103632. PubMed ID: 32505813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data abstraction: designing the tools, recruiting and training the data abstractors.
    Simmons B; Bennett F; Nelson A; Luther SL
    SCI Nurs; 2002; 19(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 12510501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.