These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31302460)

  • 1. Forensic genealogy-A comparison of methods to infer distant relationships based on dense SNP data.
    Kling D; Tillmar A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():113-124. PubMed ID: 31302460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigative genetic genealogy: Current methods, knowledge and practice.
    Kling D; Phillips C; Kennett D; Tillmar A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102474. PubMed ID: 33592389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fast and accurate kinship estimation using sparse SNPs in relatively large database searches.
    Snedecor J; Fennell T; Stadick S; Homer N; Antunes J; Stephens K; Holt C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Nov; 61():102769. PubMed ID: 36087514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Whole-genome sequencing of human remains to enable genealogy DNA database searches - A case report.
    Tillmar A; Sjölund P; Lundqvist B; Klippmark T; Älgenäs C; Green H
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102233. PubMed ID: 31981902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the Impact of Dropout and Genotyping Error on SNP-Based Kinship Analysis With Forensic Samples.
    Turner SD; Nagraj VP; Scholz M; Jessa S; Acevedo C; Ge J; Woerner AE; Budowle B
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():882268. PubMed ID: 35846115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An empirical investigation into the effectiveness of genetic genealogy to identify individuals in the UK.
    Thomson J; Clayton T; Cleary J; Gleeson M; Kennett D; Leonard M; Rutherford D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102263. PubMed ID: 32114291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Golden State Killer investigation and the nascent field of forensic genealogy.
    Phillips C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():186-188. PubMed ID: 30041097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of SNP microarray analysis of compromised DNA on kinship classification success in the context of investigative genetic genealogy.
    de Vries JH; Kling D; Vidaki A; Arp P; Kalamara V; Verbiest MMPJ; Piniewska-Róg D; Parsons TJ; Uitterlinden AG; Kayser M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102625. PubMed ID: 34753062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
    Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of a claimed distant relationship in a deficient pedigree using high density SNP data.
    Lareu MV; García-Magariños M; Phillips C; Quintela I; Carracedo A; Salas A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 21868300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the use of dense sets of SNP markers and their potential in relationship inference.
    Kling D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Mar; 39():19-31. PubMed ID: 30529859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A likelihood ratio approach for identifying three-quarter siblings in genetic databases.
    Galván-Femenía I; Barceló-Vidal C; Sumoy L; Moreno V; de Cid R; Graffelman J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Mar; 126(3):537-547. PubMed ID: 33452467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum-likelihood estimation of recent shared ancestry (ERSA).
    Huff CD; Witherspoon DJ; Simonson TS; Xing J; Watkins WS; Zhang Y; Tuohy TM; Neklason DW; Burt RW; Guthery SL; Woodward SR; Jorde LB
    Genome Res; 2011 May; 21(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 21324875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Set up of cutoff thresholds for kinship determination using SNP loci.
    Cho S; Shin ES; Yu HJ; Lee JH; Seo HJ; Kim MY; Lee SD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():1-8. PubMed ID: 28342368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Genealogical Look at Shared Ancestry on the X Chromosome.
    Buffalo V; Mount SM; Coop G
    Genetics; 2016 Sep; 204(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 27356612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA microarray as a tool in establishing genetic relatedness--Current status and future prospects.
    Kling D; Welander J; Tillmar A; Skare O; Egeland T; Holmlund G
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21813350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A parametric approach to kinship hypothesis testing using identity-by-descent parameters.
    García-Magariños M; Egeland T; López-de-Ullibarri I; Hjort NL; Salas A
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2015 Nov; 14(5):465-79. PubMed ID: 26509786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pairwise relatedness testing in the context of inbreeding: expectation and variance of the likelihood ratio.
    Brustad HK; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Jan; 135(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 32989564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cryptic distant relatives are common in both isolated and cosmopolitan genetic samples.
    Henn BM; Hon L; Macpherson JM; Eriksson N; Saxonov S; Pe'er I; Mountain JL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34267. PubMed ID: 22509285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.