These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31302460)

  • 21. Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient through use of genomic data.
    Leutenegger AL; Prum B; Génin E; Verny C; Lemainque A; Clerget-Darpoux F; Thompson EA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Sep; 73(3):516-23. PubMed ID: 12900793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of methods to estimate genomic relationships using pedigree and markers in livestock populations.
    Forneris NS; Steibel JP; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG; Bates RO; Ernst CW; Basso AL; Cantet RJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Dec; 133(6):452-462. PubMed ID: 27135179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The likelihood ratio as a random variable for linked markers in kinship analysis.
    Egeland T; Slooten K
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 27519910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relationship uncertainty linkage statistics (RULS): affected relative pair statistics that model relationship uncertainty.
    Ray A; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):313-24. PubMed ID: 18205206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rapid, Phase-free Detection of Long Identity-by-Descent Segments Enables Effective Relationship Classification.
    Seidman DN; Shenoy SA; Kim M; Babu R; Woods IG; Dyer TD; Lehman DM; Curran JE; Duggirala R; Blangero J; Williams AL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Apr; 106(4):453-466. PubMed ID: 32197076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.
    Zhang Q; Calus MP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Genetic genealogy for cold case and active investigations.
    Greytak EM; Moore C; Armentrout SL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jun; 299():103-113. PubMed ID: 30991209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pairwise Kinship Analysis by the Index of Chromosome Sharing Using High-Density Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms.
    Morimoto C; Manabe S; Kawaguchi T; Kawai C; Fujimoto S; Hamano Y; Yamada R; Matsuda F; Tamaki K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0160287. PubMed ID: 27472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of investigative genetic genealogy: perceptions of UK professional and public stakeholders.
    Samuel G; Kennett D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102366. PubMed ID: 32781429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How Well Do Molecular and Pedigree Relatedness Correspond, in Populations with Diverse Mating Systems, and Various Types and Quantities of Molecular and Demographic Data?
    Kopps AM; Kang J; Sherwin WB; Palsbøll PJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jun; 5(9):1815-26. PubMed ID: 26134496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Genetic aspects of genealogy].
    Tetushkin EIu
    Genetika; 2011 Nov; 47(11):1451-72. PubMed ID: 22332404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Further development of forensic eye color predictive tests.
    Ruiz Y; Phillips C; Gomez-Tato A; Alvarez-Dios J; Casares de Cal M; Cruz R; Maroñas O; Söchtig J; Fondevila M; Rodriguez-Cid MJ; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Jan; 7(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 22709892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment and management of single nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis.
    Gordon D; Ott J
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2001; ():18-29. PubMed ID: 11262939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating the statistical power of DNA-based identification, exemplified by 'The missing grandchildren of Argentina'.
    Kling D; Egeland T; Piñero MH; Vigeland MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():57-66. PubMed ID: 28858673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Pipeline for Classifying Relationships Using Dense SNP/SNV Data and Putative Pedigree Information.
    Zeng Z; Weeks DE; Chen W; Mukhopadhyay N; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 26709242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benchmarking Relatedness Inference Methods with Genome-Wide Data from Thousands of Relatives.
    Ramstetter MD; Dyer TD; Lehman DM; Curran JE; Duggirala R; Blangero J; Mezey JG; Williams AL
    Genetics; 2017 Sep; 207(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 28739658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Forensic genealogy: Some serious concerns.
    Syndercombe Court D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():203-204. PubMed ID: 30048922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Weighting genomic and genealogical information for genetic parameter estimation and breeding value prediction in tropical beef cattle.
    Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Mar; 96(2):612-617. PubMed ID: 29385460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimating parent-specific QTL effects through cumulating linked identity-by-state SNP effects in multiparental populations.
    Maurer A; Sannemann W; Léon J; Pillen K
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 May; 118(5):477-485. PubMed ID: 27966535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.