BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31302546)

  • 1. Energy, exergy and economic analyses of a novel biomass fueled power plant with carbon capture and sequestration.
    Yan L; Cao Y; He B
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 690():812-820. PubMed ID: 31302546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sourcing of Steam and Electricity for Carbon Capture Retrofits.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 51(21):12908-12917. PubMed ID: 28968494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On a clean power generation system with the co-gasification of biomass and coal in a quadruple fluidized bed gasifier.
    Yan L; He B
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jul; 235():113-121. PubMed ID: 28365338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of biomass integrated gasification combined cycle power systems: Performance analysis.
    Zang G; Tejasvi S; Ratner A; Lora ES
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 May; 255():246-256. PubMed ID: 29427876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thermodynamic analyses of a biomass-coal co-gasification power generation system.
    Yan L; Yue G; He B
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Apr; 205():133-41. PubMed ID: 26826573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
    Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant with CO2 capture using hot potassium carbonate solvent.
    Li S; Jin H; Gao L; Mumford KA; Smith K; Stevens G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14814-21. PubMed ID: 25389800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy and Exergy Analyses of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Gas Turbine-Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plant with Liquefied Natural Gas as Heat Sink.
    Ahmadi MH; Sadaghiani MS; Pourfayaz F; Ghazvini M; Mahian O; Mehrpooya M; Wongwises S
    Entropy (Basel); 2018 Jun; 20(7):. PubMed ID: 33265574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan.
    Craig MT; Jaramillo P; Zhai H; Klima K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 28001378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: A review.
    Wang Y; Pan Z; Zhang W; Borhani TN; Li R; Zhang Z
    Environ Res; 2022 May; 207():112219. PubMed ID: 34656638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduction in environmental CO
    Hai T; Ali MA; Alizadeh A; Almojil SF; Almohana AI; Alali AF
    Chemosphere; 2023 Apr; 319():137847. PubMed ID: 36657576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thermodynamic Analysis of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Based Combined Cooling, Heating, and Power System Integrated with Biomass Gasification.
    Cui Z; Wang J; Lior N
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Aug; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 34441169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental performance of a rice husk gasification based carbon negative combined power and cooling plant.
    Zaman SA; Ghosh S
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e23070. PubMed ID: 38163146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Policy-Driven Potential for Deploying Carbon Capture and Sequestration in a Fossil-Rich Power Sector.
    Dindi A; Coddington K; Garofalo JF; Wu W; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(14):9872-9881. PubMed ID: 35785993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Energy, exergy, emergy, and economic evaluation of a novel two-stage solar Rankine power plant.
    Hosseini R; Babaelahi M; Rafat E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(52):79140-79155. PubMed ID: 35705763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic Feasibility Study of a Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Integration Project in an Oil-Driven Economy: The Case of the State of Kuwait.
    Naseeb A; Ramadan A; Al-Salem SM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants.
    Rubin ES; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3076-84. PubMed ID: 22332665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(23):12567-12574. PubMed ID: 27792308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exergy-Based Analysis and Optimization of an Integrated Solar Combined-Cycle Power Plant.
    Elmorsy L; Morosuk T; Tsatsaronis G
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Jun; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 33286428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.