These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31302775)

  • 1. Conditional automaticity: interference effects on the implicit memory retrieval process.
    Lin J; Meng Y; Lin W
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):223-237. PubMed ID: 31302775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Divided Attention at Retrieval on Conceptual Implicit Memory.
    Prull MW; Lawless C; Marshall HM; Sherman AT
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():5. PubMed ID: 26834678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.
    Weeks JC; Hasher L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 27900585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
    Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: the attentional boost effect in implicit memory.
    Spataro P; Mulligan NW; Rossi-Arnaud C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1223-31. PubMed ID: 23356238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Event-related potential evidence for separable automatic and controlled retrieval processes in proactive interference.
    Bergström ZM; O'Connor RJ; Li MK; Simons JS
    Brain Res; 2012 May; 1455():90-102. PubMed ID: 22498173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring automatic retrieval: a comparison of implicit memory, process dissociation, and speeded response procedures.
    Horton KD; Wilson DE; Vonk J; Kirby SL; Nielsen T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Jul; 119(3):235-63. PubMed ID: 15939025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is masked priming modulated by memory load? A test of the automaticity of masked identity priming in lexical decision.
    Perea M; Marcet A; Lozano M; Gomez P
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1127-1135. PubMed ID: 29845591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
    Clarke AJ; Butler LT
    Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register.
    Guez J; Naveh-Benjamin M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74447. PubMed ID: 24040249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: further support for an asymmetry.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Guez J; Dori H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Sep; 24(5):1091-104. PubMed ID: 9747524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Memory bias and depression: a critical commentary].
    Colombel F
    Encephale; 2007; 33(3 Pt 1):242-8. PubMed ID: 17675919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit memory in patients with schizophrenia and normal controls: effects of task demands on susceptibility to priming.
    Randolph C; Gold JM; Carpenter CJ; Goldberg TE; Weinberger DR
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1993 Nov; 15(6):853-66. PubMed ID: 8120123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. L
    Shafiee Nahrkhalaji S; Lotfi AR; Koosha M
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Oct; 45(5):1247-64. PubMed ID: 26643309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task relevance modulates successful retrieval effects during explicit and implicit memory tests.
    Elman JA; Shimamura AP
    Neuroimage; 2011 May; 56(1):345-53. PubMed ID: 21316476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention and implicit memory: priming-induced benefits and costs have distinct attentional requirements.
    Keane MM; Cruz ME; Verfaellie M
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 25257650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facilitation and interference in indirect/implicit memory tests and in the process dissociation paradigm: the letter insertion and the letter deletion tasks.
    Reingold EM
    Conscious Cogn; 1995 Dec; 4(4):459-82. PubMed ID: 8750419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention and implicit memory.
    Spataro P; Mulligan NW; Rossi-Arnaud C
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 20494862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Inhibition and resource capacity during normal aging: a confrontation of the dorsal-ventral and frontal models in a modified version of negative priming].
    Martin S; Brouillet D; Guerdoux E; Tarrago R
    Encephale; 2006; 32(2 Pt 1):253-62. PubMed ID: 16910627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2474-2494. PubMed ID: 30975038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.