These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31302856)
1. Radiofrequency identification tag localization is comparable to wire localization for non-palpable breast lesions. McGugin C; Spivey T; Coopey S; Smith B; Kelly B; Gadd M; Hughes K; Dontchos B; Specht M Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Oct; 177(3):735-739. PubMed ID: 31302856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Wireless Localization Alternatives with Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions. Webster AJ; Kelly BN; McGugin C; Coopey SB; Smith BL; Gadd MA; Specht MC J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Jun; 234(6):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 35703803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of two non-radioactive alternatives to wire for the localization of non-palpable breast cancers. Lee MK; Sanaiha Y; Kusske AM; Thompson CK; Attai DJ; Baker JL; Fischer CP; DiNome ML Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jul; 182(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 32451679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic Seeds: An Alternative to Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions. Kelly BN; Webster AJ; Lamb L; Spivey T; Korotkin JE; Henriquez A; Gadd MA; Hughes KS; Lehman CR; Smith BL; Specht MC Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(5):e700-e707. PubMed ID: 35101354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiofrequency as a method of localizing impalpable breast lesions. Malik M; Brookes P; Kasana MI; Tromans L; Audrey Chew WY; Green MJ Surgeon; 2024 Oct; 22(5):296-300. PubMed ID: 39179450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of localization of non-palpable, invasive breast cancer: Wire localization vs. Iodine-125 seed: A historical comparison. In 't Hout BA; Schenk KE; van der Linden AN; Roumen RM Breast; 2016 Oct; 29():8-13. PubMed ID: 27376887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: A comparison of surgical outcomes. Patel SN; Mango VL; Jadeja P; Friedlander L; Desperito E; Wynn R; Feldman S; Ha R Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():14-17. PubMed ID: 28818762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium. van der Noordaa ME; Pengel KE; Groen E; van Werkhoven E; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Vogel W; Vrancken Peeters MJ Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25707349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag localisation of non-palpable breast lesions a single centre experience. Almalki H; Rankin AC; Juette A; Youssef MG Breast; 2023 Jun; 69():417-421. PubMed ID: 37141675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Localizing high-risk lesions for excisional breast biopsy: a comparison between radioactive seed localization and wire localization. Diego EJ; Soran A; McGuire KP; Costellic C; Johnson RR; Bonaventura M; Ahrendt GM; McAuliffe PF Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3268-72. PubMed ID: 25034818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The LOCalizer Radiofrequency Identification System: An Effective New Technology for Localizing Non-Palpable Breast Lesions for Surgery. Cullinane CM; Byrne J; Akmenkalne L; O' Leary DP; Connors AM; Corrigan MA; Redmond HP; Kelly L; O' Sullivan MJ Surg Innov; 2021 Aug; 28(4):473-478. PubMed ID: 33085567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of an Electromagnetic Seed Localization Device Versus Wire Localization on Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Matched-Pair Analysis. Jordan RM; Rivera-Sanchez L; Kelley K; O'Brien MA; Ruth K; Porpiglia AS; Aggon AA; Ross E; Sigurdson ER; Bleicher RJ Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 30(7):4111-4119. PubMed ID: 37012435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of a phase I, non-randomized study evaluating a Magnetic Occult Lesion Localization Instrument (MOLLI) for excision of non-palpable breast lesions. Look Hong N; Wright FC; Semple M; Nicolae AM; Ravi A Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Feb; 179(3):671-676. PubMed ID: 31754951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and efficacy of radioactive seed localization with I-125 prior to lumpectomy and/or excisional biopsy. Sung JS; King V; Thornton CM; Brooks JD; Fry CW; El-Tamer M; Dauer LT; Brogi E; St Germain JM; Morris EA Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1453-7. PubMed ID: 23684386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. RFID trial: localization of non-palpable breast lesions using radiofrequency identification tags or wire. Veyssiere H; Dressaire M; Pete R; Pinard C; Molnar I; Abrial C; Ginzac A; Durando X; Tekath M BMC Cancer; 2023 Jul; 23(1):679. PubMed ID: 37468859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluoroscopic Intraoperative Breast Neoplasm and Node Detection. Weiser R; Manno GC; Cass SH; Chen L; Kuo YF; He J; Robinson AS; Posleman Monetto F; Silva HC; Klimberg VS J Am Coll Surg; 2023 Apr; 236(4):575-585. PubMed ID: 36728380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging Factors That Influence Surgical Margins After Preoperative 125I Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: Comparison With Wire Localization. Dryden MJ; Dogan BE; Fox P; Wang C; Black DM; Hunt K; Yang WT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 27007608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Gray RJ; Salud C; Nguyen K; Dauway E; Friedland J; Berman C; Peltz E; Whitehead G; Cox CE Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Oct; 8(9):711-5. PubMed ID: 11597011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrospective Review of Preoperative Radiofrequency Tag Localization of Breast Lesions in 848 Patients. Lamb LR; Gilman L; Specht M; D'Alessandro HA; Miles RC; Lehman CD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):605-612. PubMed ID: 33084384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]