197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31303561)
1. Variation in Positive Surgical Margin Status After Radical Prostatectomy for pT2 Prostate Cancer.
Tan WS; Krimphove MJ; Cole AP; Marchese M; Berg S; Lipsitz SR; Löppenberg B; Nabi J; Abdollah F; Choueiri TK; Kibel AS; Sooriakumaran P; Trinh QD
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Oct; 17(5):e1060-e1068. PubMed ID: 31303561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.
Chalfin HJ; Dinizo M; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Humphreys E; Han M
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1684-9. PubMed ID: 22788795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Apical surgical margins status in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on disease characteristics.
Tsivian M; Zilberman DE; Ferrandino MN; Madden JF; Mouraviev V; Albala DM
J Endourol; 2012 Apr; 26(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22192106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database.
Vesey SG; McCabe JE; Hounsome L; Fowler S
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 21771246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating Incidence, Location, and Predictors of Positive Surgical Margin Among Chinese Men Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Qu W; Yu S; Tao J; Dong B; Fan Y; Du H; Deng H; Liu J; Zhang X
Cancer Control; 2021; 28():10732748211055265. PubMed ID: 34794321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.
Sooriakumaran P; Srivastava A; Shariat SF; Stricker PD; Ahlering T; Eden CG; Wiklund PN; Sanchez-Salas R; Mottrie A; Lee D; Neal DE; Ghavamian R; Nyirady P; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Xylinas E; Loidl W; Seitz C; Schramek P; Roehrborn C; Cathelineau X; Skarecky D; Shaw G; Warren A; Delprado WJ; Haynes AM; Steyerberg E; Roobol MJ; Tewari AK
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 24290695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors.
Liss M; Osann K; Ornstein D
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 18435807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of biochemical recurrence and positive surgical margins in patients with pT2 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Røder MA; Thomsen FB; Berg KD; Christensen IB; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 109(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 24155174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rates of Positive Surgical Margins and Their Effect on Cancer-specific Mortality at Radical Prostatectomy for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.
Preisser F; Mazzone E; Knipper S; Nazzani S; Bandini M; Shariat SF; Tian Z; Saad F; Montorsi F; Zorn KC; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e130-e139. PubMed ID: 30366880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
Maxeiner A; Magheli A; Jöhrens K; Kilic E; Braun TL; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Stephan C; Miller K; Busch J
BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of prior TURP on radical prostatectomy surgical margins: a multicenter analysis.
Gacci M; Simonato A; Lanciotti M; Ennas M; Varca V; Maffezzini M; Imbimbo C; Gontero P; Schiavina R; Carini M; Martorana G; Nicita G; Mirone V; Carmignani G
Urol Int; 2013; 91(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23735440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
