These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses. de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Endoscopic ultrasound core needle for diagnosing of solid pancreatic lesions: is rapid on-site evaluation really necessary? Arena M; Eusebi LH; Pellicano R; Palamara MA; Iabichino G; Consolo P; Fagoonee S; Opocher E; Barabino M; Luigiano C Minerva Med; 2017 Dec; 108(6):547-553. PubMed ID: 28750500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using Fork-Tip Needle Improves Histological Yield, Reduces Needle Passes, Without On-Site Cytopathological Evaluation. Song Z; Trujillo CN; Song H; Tongson-Ignacio JE; Chan MY J Pancreat Cancer; 2018; 4(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 30788461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Kim GH; Cho YK; Kim EY; Kim HK; Cho JW; Lee TH; Moon JS; Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New Developments in Endoscopic Ultrasound Tissue Acquisition. Muniraj T; Aslanian HR Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2017 Oct; 27(4):585-599. PubMed ID: 28918800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The evolving role of EUS-guided tissue acquisition. Ang TL; Wang LM J Dig Dis; 2021 Apr; 22(4):204-213. PubMed ID: 33611846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for schwannoma: six cases of a retrospective study. Takasumi M; Hikichi T; Takagi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Sugimoto M; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Asama H; Obara K; Ohira H Fukushima J Med Sci; 2017 Aug; 63(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 28680005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle biopsy with histology specimen processing. Ku L; Shahshahan MA; Hou LA; Eysselein VE; Reicher S World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Aug; 12(8):212-219. PubMed ID: 32879656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic Endoscopic Ultrasound: Technique, Current Status and Future Directions. Ang TL; Kwek ABE; Wang LM Gut Liver; 2018 Sep; 12(5):483-496. PubMed ID: 29291601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Present and Future of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition in Solid Pancreatic Tumors. Park JK; Lee KH Clin Endosc; 2019 Nov; 52(6):541-548. PubMed ID: 31812159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study. Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study. Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Benefit of high negative pressure during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with standard 22-gauge needles for pancreatic lesions: a retrospective comparative study. Sato J; Ishiwatari H; Sasaki K; Fujie S; Kaneko J; Satoh T; Matsubayashi H; Kishida Y; Yoshida M; Ito S; Kawata N; Imai K; Kakushima N; Takizawa K; Hotta K; Ono H Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30676114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration needles: which one and in what situation? Karadsheh Z; Al-Haddad M Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2014 Jan; 24(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 24215760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions. Rong L; Kida M; Yamauchi H; Okuwaki K; Miyazawa S; Iwai T; Kikuchi H; Watanabe M; Imaizumi H; Koizumi W Dig Endosc; 2012 Sep; 24(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 22925290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]