These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31304239)

  • 1. Fine-needle biopsy is superior to fine-needle aspiration of suspected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a large multicenter study.
    Trindade AJ; Benias PC; Alshelleh M; Bazarbashi AN; Tharian B; Inamdar S; Sharma N; Zelt C; Korrapati P; Barakat M; Sejpal DV; Ryou M
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Jul; 7(7):E931-E936. PubMed ID: 31304239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
    El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using Fork-Tip Needle Improves Histological Yield, Reduces Needle Passes, Without On-Site Cytopathological Evaluation.
    Song Z; Trujillo CN; Song H; Tongson-Ignacio JE; Chan MY
    J Pancreat Cancer; 2018; 4(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 30788461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
    Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B
    Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Chen YI; Chatterjee A; Berger R; Kanber Y; Wyse J; Lam E; Gan I; Auger M; Kenshil S; Telford J; Donnellan F; Quinlan J; Lutzak G; Alshamsi F; Parent J; Waschke K; Alghamdi A; Barkun J; Metrakos P; Chaudhury P; Martel M; Dorreen A; Candido K; Miller C; Adam V; Barkun A; Zogopoulos G; Wong C
    Endoscopy; 2022 Jan; 54(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 33506455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
    Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration versus Fine-Needle Biopsy for Lymph Node Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Comparative Analysis.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Clin Endosc; 2020 Sep; 53(5):600-610. PubMed ID: 31794654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition.
    Bang JY; Kirtane S; Krall K; Navaneethan U; Hasan M; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Mar; 31(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 30256458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The difference in histological yield between 19G EUS-FNA and EUS-fine-needle biopsy needles.
    Ang TL; Li JW; Kwek ABE; Thurairajah PH; Wang LM
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2019; 8(4):255-260. PubMed ID: 31115385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.
    Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine-Needle Aspiration and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Lesions in a Multicenter, Randomized Trial.
    Nagula S; Pourmand K; Aslanian H; Bucobo JC; Gonda TA; Gonzalez S; Goodman A; Gross SA; Ho S; DiMaio CJ; Kim MK; Pais S; Poneros JM; Robbins DH; Schnoll-Sussman F; Sethi A; Buscaglia JM;
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1307-1313.e1. PubMed ID: 28624647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
    de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Hathorn KE; Madruga-Neto AC; Lee LS; Thompson CC
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.