172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31304678)
1. Histogram analysis of en face scattering coefficient map predicts malignancy in human ovarian tissue.
Zeng Y; Nandy S; Rao B; Li S; Hagemann AR; Kuroki LK; McCourt C; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Hagemann IS; Zhu Q
J Biophotonics; 2019 Nov; 12(11):e201900115. PubMed ID: 31304678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative analysis of angle-resolved scattering properties of ovarian tissue using optical coherence tomography.
Yang Y; Wang T; Brewer M; Zhu Q
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Sep; 17(9):90503-1. PubMed ID: 23085900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosing colorectal abnormalities using scattering coefficient maps acquired from optical coherence tomography.
Zeng Y; Chapman WC; Lin Y; Li S; Mutch M; Zhu Q
J Biophotonics; 2021 Jan; 14(1):e202000276. PubMed ID: 33064368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Depth-resolved attenuation mapping of the human ovary and fallopian tube using optical coherence tomography.
Li S; Luo H; Kou S; Hagemann IS; Zhu Q
J Biophotonics; 2023 Jun; 16(6):e202300002. PubMed ID: 36916760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterizing optical properties and spatial heterogeneity of human ovarian tissue using spatial frequency domain imaging.
Nandy S; Mostafa A; Kumavor PD; Sanders M; Brewer M; Zhu Q
J Biomed Opt; 2016 Oct; 21(10):101402. PubMed ID: 26822943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An overview of optical coherence tomography for ovarian tissue imaging and characterization.
Wang T; Brewer M; Zhu Q
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol; 2015; 7(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 25329515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optical scattering coefficient estimated by optical coherence tomography correlates with collagen content in ovarian tissue.
Yang Y; Wang T; Biswal NC; Wang X; Sanders M; Brewer M; Zhu Q
J Biomed Opt; 2011 Sep; 16(9):090504. PubMed ID: 21950907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optical Resolution Photoacoustic Microscopy of Ovary and Fallopian Tube.
Rao B; Leng X; Zeng Y; Lin Y; Chen R; Zhou Q; Hagemann AR; Kuroki LM; McCourt CK; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Hagemann IS; Zhu Q
Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):14306. PubMed ID: 31586106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous optical coherence tomography and laser induced fluorescence imaging in rat model of ovarian carcinogenesis.
Hariri LP; Liebmann ER; Marion SL; Hoyer PB; Davis JR; Brewer MA; Barton JK
Cancer Biol Ther; 2010 Sep; 10(5):438-47. PubMed ID: 21108515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coregistered photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging and classification of ovarian cancer: ex vivo and in vivo studies.
Salehi HS; Li H; Merkulov A; Kumavor PD; Vavadi H; Sanders M; Kueck A; Brewer MA; Zhu Q
J Biomed Opt; 2016 Apr; 21(4):46006. PubMed ID: 27086690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A three-parameter logistic model to characterize ovarian tissue using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography.
Wang T; Yang Y; Zhu Q
Biomed Opt Express; 2013 May; 4(5):772-7. PubMed ID: 23667792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utilizing spatial and spectral features of photoacoustic imaging for ovarian cancer detection and diagnosis.
Li H; Kumavor P; Salman Alqasemi U; Zhu Q
J Biomed Opt; 2015 Jan; 20(1):016002. PubMed ID: 25554971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolutionary algorithm-based classifier parameter tuning for automatic ovarian cancer tissue characterization and classification.
Acharya UR; Mookiah MR; Vinitha Sree S; Yanti R; Martis RJ; Saba L; Molinari F; Guerriero S; Suri JS
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Jun; 35(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 23258769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumes of normal ovaries, ovaries with benign lesions, and ovaries with cancer in menopausal women: is there an optimal cut-off value to predict malignancy?
Aviram R; Gassner G; Markovitch O; Cohen I; Fishman A; Tepper R
J Clin Ultrasound; 2008 Jan; 36(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17924576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo time-serial multi-modality optical imaging in a mouse model of ovarian tumorigenesis.
Watson JM; Marion SL; Rice PF; Bentley DL; Besselsen DG; Utzinger U; Hoyer PB; Barton JK
Cancer Biol Ther; 2014 Jan; 15(1):42-60. PubMed ID: 24145178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual modality imaging of a novel rat model of ovarian carcinogenesis.
Kanter EM; Walker RM; Marion SL; Brewer M; Hoyer PB; Barton JK
J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(4):041123. PubMed ID: 16965151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Iterative prototyping based on lessons learned from the falloposcope
Rocha AD; Drake WK; Rice PF; Long DJ; Shir H; Walton RHM; Reed MN; Galvez D; Gorman T; Heusinkveld JM; Barton JK
J Biomed Opt; 2023 Dec; 28(12):121206. PubMed ID: 37577082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microscopic benign and invasive malignant neoplasms and a cancer-prone phenotype in prophylactic oophorectomies.
Salazar H; Godwin AK; Daly MB; Laub PB; Hogan WM; Rosenblum N; Boente MP; Lynch HT; Hamilton TC
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 Dec; 88(24):1810-20. PubMed ID: 8961970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between types I and II epithelial ovarian cancer using histogram analysis of monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion models.
Wang F; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Liu C; Xie L; Zhou Z; Liang D; Shen Y; Yao Z; Liu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1797-1809. PubMed ID: 28379611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultra-High-
Mokry T; Mlynarska-Bujny A; Kuder TA; Hasse FC; Hog R; Wallwiener M; Dinkic C; Brucker J; Sinn P; Gnirs R; Kauczor HU; Schlemmer HP; Rom J; Bickelhaupt S
Radiology; 2020 Aug; 296(2):358-369. PubMed ID: 32544033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
