These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31305347)

  • 1. Surface changes and bacterial adhesion on implant abutment materials after various clinical cleaning procedures.
    Huang YS; Hung CY; Huang HH
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2019 Aug; 82(8):643-650. PubMed ID: 31305347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cell Attachment Following Instrumentation with Titanium and Plastic Instruments, Diode Laser, and Titanium Brush on Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, and Zirconia Surfaces.
    Lang MS; Cerutis DR; Miyamoto T; Nunn ME
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 27447145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials.
    Checketts MR; Turkyilmaz I; Asar NV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1265-70. PubMed ID: 24831748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cleaning effectiveness of implant prophylaxis instruments.
    Schmage P; Kahili F; Nergiz I; Scorziello TM; Platzer U; Pfeiffer P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 24683558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods.
    Vigolo P; Motterle M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of physical decontamination methods on zirconia implant surface and subsequent bacterial adhesion: An in-vitro study.
    Tan NCP; Miller CM; Antunes E; Sharma D
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Feb; 8(1):313-321. PubMed ID: 34599862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of titanium or zirconia implant abutments on epithelial attachments after ultrasonic cleaning.
    Hu J; Atsuta I; Ayukawa Y; Zhou T; Narimatsu I; Koyano K
    J Oral Sci; 2020; 62(3):331-334. PubMed ID: 32581180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface properties of titanium and zirconia dental implant materials and their effect on bacterial adhesion.
    Al-Radha AS; Dymock D; Younes C; O'Sullivan D
    J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 22182466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In Vitro Comparison of Titanium Disc Surface Roughness and Bacterial Colonization After Ultrasonic Instrumentation With Three Different Tips.
    Kitaygorodskiy A; Gregory RL; Lim G; Hamada Y
    J Oral Implantol; 2024 Oct; 50(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 39023858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.
    Smith NA; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of air polishing with glycine powder on titanium abutment surfaces.
    Cochis A; Fini M; Carrassi A; Migliario M; Visai L; Rimondini L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):904-9. PubMed ID: 22626061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Meer C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early and mature biofilm on four different dental implant materials: An in vivo human study.
    Herrmann H; Kern JS; Kern T; Lautensack J; Conrads G; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1094-1104. PubMed ID: 32871610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Surface Conditions of Titanium Dental Implants on Bacterial Adhesion.
    Chen CJ; Ding SJ; Chen CC
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2016 Sep; 34(9):379-88. PubMed ID: 27454339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Different Cleaning Procedures on Tensile Bond Strength Between Zirconia Abutment and Titanium Base.
    Wiedenmann F; Liebermann A; Spintzyk S; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(6):1318-1327. PubMed ID: 31711075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of surface alteration on epithelial tissue attachment after the mechanical cleaning of titanium or zirconia surface.
    Hu J; Atsuta I; Ayukawa Y; Zhou X; Dwi Rakhmatia Y; Koyano K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 47(9):1065-1076. PubMed ID: 31820464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Instrumentation With Ultrasonic Scalers Facilitates Cleaning of the Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Titanium Implants.
    Park JB; Lee SH; Kim N; Park S; Jin SH; Choi BK; Kim KK; Ko Y
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 24552131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Zirconia versus titanium in dentistry: A review.
    Hanawa T
    Dent Mater J; 2020 Jan; 39(1):24-36. PubMed ID: 31666488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the impact of scaler material composition on polished titanium implant abutment surfaces.
    Hasturk H; Nguyen DH; Sherzai H; Song X; Soukos N; Bidlack FB; Van Dyke TE
    J Dent Hyg; 2013 Aug; 87(4):200-11. PubMed ID: 23986413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.