These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31305347)

  • 21. The maintenance of inserted titanium implants: in-vitro evaluation of exposed surfaces cleaned with three different instruments.
    Bertoldi C; Lusuardi D; Battarra F; Sassatelli P; Spinato S; Zaffe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jan; 28(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 26744027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Plaque formation on surface modified dental implants. An in vitro study.
    Grössner-Schreiber B; Griepentrog M; Haustein I; Müller WD; Lange KP; Briedigkeit H; Göbel UB
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Dec; 12(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 11737097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of Surface Modifications on Bacterial Adherence to Implant Abutment Materials.
    Ozer F; Anadioti E; Mack YY; Sen D; DiRienzo J; Blatz MB
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2022; 42(5):657-663. PubMed ID: 36044698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An In Vitro Evaluation of Alumina, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Surface Roughness Caused by Two Scaling Instruments.
    Vigolo P; Buzzo O; Buzzo M; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 26683122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Maintenance of implants: an in vitro study of titanium implant surface modifications subsequent to the application of different prophylaxis procedures.
    Matarasso S; Quaremba G; Coraggio F; Vaia E; Cafiero C; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Mar; 7(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 9002824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of 10 cleaning instruments on four different implant surfaces.
    Schmage P; Thielemann J; Nergiz I; Scorziello TM; Pfeiffer P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 22442769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surface property alterations and osteoblast attachment to contaminated titanium surfaces after different surface treatments: An in vitro study.
    Lee BS; Shih KS; Lai CH; Takeuchi Y; Chen YW
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):583-591. PubMed ID: 29939477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stability and aging resistance of a zirconia oral implant using a carbon fiber-reinforced screw for implant-abutment connection.
    Spies BC; Fross A; Adolfsson E; Bagegni A; Doerken S; Kohal RJ
    Dent Mater; 2018 Oct; 34(10):1585-1595. PubMed ID: 30180975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study.
    Klotz MW; Taylor TD; Goldberg AJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):970-5. PubMed ID: 22010078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Effects of different implant materials and surface microgrooves on the biological behavior of gingival fibroblasts].
    Lai YZ; Lu XG; Cai YH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):676-682. PubMed ID: 31607003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of different polishing protocols on the surface roughness of Y-TZP surfaces used for custom-made implant abutments: a controlled morphologic SEM and profilometric pilot study.
    Happe A; Röling N; Schäfer A; Rothamel D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 25749083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.
    Yüzügüllü B; Avci M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of different methods to clean titanium abutments. A scanning electron microscopic study.
    Speelman JA; Collaert B; Klinge B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Sep; 3(3):120-7. PubMed ID: 1290792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis.
    Bollen CM; Papaioanno W; Van Eldere J; Schepers E; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Sep; 7(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 9151584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implant surface roughness alterations induced by different prophylactic procedures: an in vitro study.
    Cafiero C; Aglietta M; Iorio-Siciliano V; Salvi GE; Blasi A; Matarasso S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):e16-e20. PubMed ID: 27283010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fracture resistance of inter-joined zirconia abutment of dental implant system with injection molding technique.
    Yang J; Wang K; Liu G; Wang D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1247-50. PubMed ID: 22809060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study.
    Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The influence of surface roughness on bacteria adhesion on titanium].
    Li M; Yang S; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Nov; 36(6):431-3. PubMed ID: 11930717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of titanium and zirconia dental implant abutments on a cultivable polymicrobial saliva community.
    de Avila ED; Vergani CE; Mollo Junior FA; Junior MJ; Shi W; Lux R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Oct; 118(4):481-487. PubMed ID: 28343672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.