These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31306691)
1. Survival rates and complication behaviour of tooth implant-supported, fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. von Stein-Lausnitz M; Nickenig HJ; Wolfart S; Neumann K; von Stein-Lausnitz A; Spies BC; Beuer F J Dent; 2019 Sep; 88():103167. PubMed ID: 31306691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses. Sailer I; Strasding M; Valente NA; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Pjetursson BE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():184-198. PubMed ID: 30328185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Pjetursson BE; Thoma D; Jung R; Zwahlen M; Zembic A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():22-38. PubMed ID: 23062125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review. Le M; Papia E; Larsson C J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 42(6):467-80. PubMed ID: 25580846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical outcomes of partial and full-arch all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pieralli S; Kohal RJ; Rabel K; von Stein-Lausnitz M; Vach K; Spies BC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 18():224-236. PubMed ID: 30306694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Pjetursson BE; Sailer I; Makarov NA; Zwahlen M; Thoma DS Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):624-39. PubMed ID: 25935732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of reporting of clinical studies to assess and compare performance of implant-supported restorations. Pjetursson BE; Zwahlen M; Lang NP J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 39 Suppl 12():139-59. PubMed ID: 22533954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Pjetursson BE; Brägger U; Lang NP; Zwahlen M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():97-113. PubMed ID: 17594374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses: Are the results of 2 abutment implants comparable to the results of 2 abutment teeth? Pol CWP; Raghoebar GM; Kerdijk W; Boven GC; Cune MS; Meijer HJA J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 45(2):147-160. PubMed ID: 28940725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-reported outcome measures focusing on aesthetics of implant- and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wittneben JG; Wismeijer D; Brägger U; Joda T; Abou-Ayash S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():224-240. PubMed ID: 30328183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the optimal number of implants for fixed reconstructions: a systematic review. Heydecke G; Zwahlen M; Nicol A; Nisand D; Payer M; Renouard F; Grohmann P; Mühlemann S; Joda T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():217-28. PubMed ID: 23062144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers. Hälg GA; Schmid J; Hämmerle CH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):983-90. PubMed ID: 18828813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival and complication rates of tooth-implant versus freestanding implant supporting fixed partial prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. La Monaca G; Pranno N; Annibali S; Massimo C; Polimeni A; Patini R; Paola Cristalli M J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Feb; 65(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 32938874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of rigid and non-rigid connections between implants and teeth on biological and technical complications: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Tsaousoglou P; Michalakis K; Kang K; Weber HP; Sculean A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):849-863. PubMed ID: 27350419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A critical appraisal of the survival and complication rates of tooth-supported all-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: the application of evidence-based dentistry. Layton D Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):417-27. PubMed ID: 21909482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognosis of Combining Remaining Teeth and Implants in Double-Crown-Retained Removable Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lian M; Zhao K; Feng Y; Yao Q Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):281–297. PubMed ID: 28938029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of technical complications and risk factors for failure of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Chrcanovic BR; Kisch J; Larsson C Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 22(4):523-532. PubMed ID: 32524744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Sailer I; Makarov NA; Thoma DS; Zwahlen M; Pjetursson BE Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):603-23. PubMed ID: 25842099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]