BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31306884)

  • 1. Spontaneous visual search during the first two years: Improvement with age but no evidence of efficient search.
    Goldknopf EJ; Gillespie-Lynch K; Marroquín AD; Nguyen BD; Johnson SP
    Infant Behav Dev; 2019 Nov; 57():101331. PubMed ID: 31306884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Search asymmetry and eye movements in infants and adults.
    Adler SA; Gallego P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1590-608. PubMed ID: 24858309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants.
    Amso D; Johnson SP
    Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encouraging top-down attention in visual search:A developmental perspective.
    Lookadoo R; Yang Y; Merrill EC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2007-2020. PubMed ID: 28718176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development.
    Chevalier N; Blaye A; Dufau S; Lucenet J
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Jul; 46(4):955-72. PubMed ID: 20604615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of visual search in infancy: Attention to faces versus salience.
    Kwon MK; Setoodehnia M; Baek J; Luck SJ; Oakes LM
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Apr; 52(4):537-55. PubMed ID: 26866728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object-based visual attention in 8-month-old infants: evidence from an eye-tracking study.
    Bulf H; Valenza E
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Oct; 49(10):1909-18. PubMed ID: 23276133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Out of sight, out of mind: Matching bias underlies confirmatory visual search.
    Rajsic J; Taylor JE; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):498-507. PubMed ID: 28000157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
    Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dwelling on simple stimuli in visual search.
    Horstmann G; Becker SI; Grubert A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):607-625. PubMed ID: 31721042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Texture segmentation and visual search for pop-out targets. An ERP study.
    Schubö A; Schröger E; Meinecke C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):317-34. PubMed ID: 15511648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory.
    Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Toffanin P; Luria R; Jolicoeur P
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):419-28. PubMed ID: 19804791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Running the figure to the ground: figure-ground segmentation during visual search.
    Ralph BC; Seli P; Cheng VO; Solman GJ; Smilek D
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():65-73. PubMed ID: 24582768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic parts are not exclusive in the search template for real-world object categories.
    Wurth M; Reeder RR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():11-17. PubMed ID: 30939331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of local fluency gradient of objects creates search asymmetry.
    Yamashita J; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 30141124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The visual search of an illusory figure: a comparison between 6-month-old infants and adults.
    Bulf H; Valenza E; Simion F
    Perception; 2009; 38(9):1313-27. PubMed ID: 19911629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual information and object size in infant reaching.
    Berthier NE; Carrico RL
    Infant Behav Dev; 2010 Dec; 33(4):555-66. PubMed ID: 20708270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. False pop out.
    Orsten-Hooge KD; Portillo MC; Pomerantz JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1623-33. PubMed ID: 26214500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.