These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31306915)

  • 1. Privacy and data protection in the surveillance society: The case of the Prüm system.
    Matos S
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2019 Aug; 66():155-161. PubMed ID: 31306915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risks and benefits of transnational exchange of forensic DNA data in the EU: The views of professionals operating the Prüm system.
    Machado H; Granja R
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2019 Nov; 68():101872. PubMed ID: 31600636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patterns of exchange of forensic DNA data in the European Union through the Prüm system.
    Santos F; Machado H
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jul; 57(4):307-313. PubMed ID: 28606337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Prüm Decisions as an Aspirational regime: Reviewing a Decade of Cross-Border Exchange and Comparison of Forensic DNA Data.
    Toom V; Granja R; Ludwig A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():50-57. PubMed ID: 30959458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performing the Union: the Prüm Decision and the European dream.
    Prainsack B; Toom V
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 23021789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In search of a free movement of forensic evidence: Towards minimum standards to determine evidence admissibility?
    Depauw S
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Aug; 74():102021. PubMed ID: 32769042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A response to the forensic genetics policy initiative's report "Establishing Best Practice for Forensic DNA Databases".
    Samuel G; Howard HC; Cornel M; van El C; Hall A; Forzano F; Prainsack B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():e19-e21. PubMed ID: 30030012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical challenges of merging criminal identification and civil identification within the Prüm system.
    Machado H; Granja R; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Mar; 57():102660. PubMed ID: 35032950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Directive 95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 27():83-118. PubMed ID: 10172823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in forensic DNA database: transnational exchange of DNA data.
    Amankwaa AO
    Forensic Sci Res; 2020; 5(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 32490305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. IT solutions for privacy protection in biobanking.
    Eder J; Gottweis H; Zatloukal K
    Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):254-62. PubMed ID: 22722689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The European Parliament proposal for the new EU General Data Protection Regulation may severely restrict European epidemiological research.
    Nyrén O; Stenbeck M; Grönberg H
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 29(4):227-30. PubMed ID: 24802287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The retention of forensic DNA samples: a socio-ethical evaluation of current practices in the EU.
    Van Camp N; Dierickx K
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Aug; 34(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 18667650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Legal assessment tool (LAT): an interactive tool to address privacy and data protection issues for data sharing.
    Kuchinke W; Krauth C; Bergmann R; Karakoyun T; Woollard A; Schluender I; Braasch B; Eckert M; Ohmann C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16(1):81. PubMed ID: 27751180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proposed EU data protection regulation is a threat to medical research.
    Ploem MC; Essink-Bot ML; Stronks K
    BMJ; 2013 May; 346():f3534. PubMed ID: 23729429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protecting privacy and the public--limits on police use of bioidentifiers in Europe.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Jul; 361(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 19587347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The European cross-border health data exchange roadmap: Case study in the Italian setting.
    Nalin M; Baroni I; Faiella G; Romano M; Matrisciano F; Gelenbe E; Martinez DM; Dumortier J; Natsiavas P; Votis K; Koutkias V; Tzovaras D; Clemente F
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Jun; 94():103183. PubMed ID: 31009760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling and enforcing privacy for medical data disclosure across Europe.
    Boussi Rahmouni H; Solomonides T; Casassa Mont M; Shiu S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():695-9. PubMed ID: 19745400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Privacy impact assessment in the design of transnational public health information systems: the BIRO project.
    Di Iorio CT; Carinci F; Azzopardi J; Baglioni V; Beck P; Cunningham S; Evripidou A; Leese G; Loevaas KF; Olympios G; Federici MO; Pruna S; Palladino P; Skeie S; Taverner P; Traynor V; Benedetti MM
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Dec; 35(12):753-61. PubMed ID: 19948932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Genetic fingerprints and computerised databases].
    Sabatier M
    J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 15005514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.