These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31307555)

  • 41. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions.
    Kelly MP; Noyes J; Kane RL; Chang C; Uhl S; Robinson KA; Springs S; Butler ME; Guise JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():11-18. PubMed ID: 28720514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Changes in blood pressure among users of lay health worker or volunteer operated community-based blood pressure programs over time: a systematic review protocol.
    Skar P; Young L; Gordon C
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):30-40. PubMed ID: 26571280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Practical guide to undertaking scoping reviews for pharmacy clinicians, researchers and policymakers.
    Khalil H; McInerney P; Pollock D; Alexander L; Munn Z; Tricco AC; Godfrey CM; Peters MDJ
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2022 Feb; 47(2):129-134. PubMed ID: 34714560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Systematic reviews and their application to research in speech and language therapy: a response to T. R. Pring's 'Ask a silly question: two decades of troublesome trials' (2004).
    Garrett Z; Thomas J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2006; 41(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 16272005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Family-based interventions for substance misuse: a systematic review of systematic reviews--protocol.
    Akram Y; Copello A; Moore D
    Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; 3():90. PubMed ID: 25128186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences.
    Munn Z; Stern C; Aromataris E; Lockwood C; Jordan Z
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):5. PubMed ID: 29316881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review.
    Pollock A; Campbell P; Struthers C; Synnot A; Nunn J; Hill S; Goodare H; Morris J; Watts C; Morley R
    Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 7(1):208. PubMed ID: 30474560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Concepts and approaches for marine ecosystem research with reference to the tropics.
    Wolff M
    Rev Biol Trop; 2002 Jun; 50(2):395-414. PubMed ID: 12298274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The refinement of topics for systematic reviews: lessons and recommendations from the Effective Health Care Program.
    Buckley DI; Ansari MT; Butler M; Soh C; Chang CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 24581296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Community-based supplementary feeding for food insecure, vulnerable and malnourished populations - an overview of systematic reviews.
    Visser J; McLachlan MH; Maayan N; Garner P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 11(11):CD010578. PubMed ID: 30480324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts.
    Audretsch DB; Cunningham JA; Kuratko DF; Lehmann EE; Menter M
    J Technol Transf; 2019; 44(2):313-325. PubMed ID: 30956392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Are we talking the same paradigm? Considering methodological choices in health education systematic review.
    Gordon M
    Med Teach; 2016 Jul; 38(7):746-50. PubMed ID: 27007488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Future of evidence ecosystem series: 2. current opportunities and need for better tools and methods.
    Créquit P; Boutron I; Meerpohl J; Williams HC; Craig J; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():143-152. PubMed ID: 32145369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The TRANSFER Approach for assessing the transferability of systematic review findings.
    Munthe-Kaas H; Nøkleby H; Lewin S; Glenton C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):11. PubMed ID: 31952495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Newton AS; Scott SD; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):29. PubMed ID: 30670086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Functional ecology's non-selectionist understanding of function.
    Dussault AC
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2018 Aug; 70():1-9. PubMed ID: 30060909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for a variety of conditions: an overview of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis.
    Fordham B; Sugavanam T; Edwards K; Hemming K; Howick J; Copsey B; Lee H; Kaidesoja M; Kirtley S; Hopewell S; das Nair R; Howard R; Stallard P; Hamer-Hunt J; Cooper Z; Lamb SE
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Feb; 25(9):1-378. PubMed ID: 33629950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Software engineering principles address current problems in the systematic review ecosystem.
    Bashir R; Dunn AG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 May; 109():136-141. PubMed ID: 30582972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An effective method to summarise the outcomes of questionnaire-based studies in systematic reviews.
    Tewari N; Goel S; Haldar P; Mathur VP; Srivastav S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2022 Nov; 80(8):569-572. PubMed ID: 35311426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.