333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31307743)
1. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic single-port hysterectomy versus robotic multisite hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: A retrospective comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes.
Park SY; Cho EH; Jeong K; Yoo HK; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Nov; 49(11):2746-2752. PubMed ID: 37635443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between single-site and multiport robot-assisted hysterectomy in obese patients with endometrial cancer: An Italian multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Cela V; Gardella B; Sperduti I; Certelli C; Pellegrini A; Posar G; Zampa A; Tateo S; Gadducci A; Spinillo A; Vizza E
Int J Med Robot; 2020 Apr; 16(2):e2066. PubMed ID: 31850677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: two institutions' preliminary experience.
Bogliolo S; Mereu L; Cassani C; Gardella B; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Babilonti L; Delpezzo C; Tateo S; Spinillo A
Int J Med Robot; 2015 Jun; 11(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 25231021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of surgical outcomes and learning curve of surgical parameters for robotic hysterectomy: a comparison between multiport versus single-site.
Gardella B; Dominoni M; Gritti A; Musacchi V; Stracquadaini M; Bogliolo S; Scudeller L; Spinillo A
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Aug; 31(6):954-961. PubMed ID: 35225752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.
Gungor M; Kahraman K; Dursun P; Ozbasli E; Genim C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28429119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-site hysterectomy: our experience and multicentric comparison with single-port laparoscopy.
Cela V; Marrucci E; Angioni S; Freschi L
Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Oct; 70(5):621-628. PubMed ID: 29856186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical outcome for robotic-assisted single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) in female-to male reassignment compared to its use in benign gynecological disease: a single center experience.
Gardella B; Dominoni M; Bogliolo S; Spinillo A
J Robot Surg; 2021 Aug; 15(4):579-584. PubMed ID: 32880794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic Trachelectomy After Supracervical Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease.
Tsafrir Z; Aoun J; Hanna R; Papalekas E; Schiff L; Theoharis E; Eisenstein D
JSLS; 2016; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 27493470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
El-Mowafi D; Madkour W; Lall C; Wenger JM
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 May; 11(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 15200770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
