These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31307743)
1. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases. Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study. Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Scheib SA; Fader AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse. Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic single-port hysterectomy versus robotic multisite hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: A retrospective comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes. Park SY; Cho EH; Jeong K; Yoo HK; Lee JH; Moon HS J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Nov; 49(11):2746-2752. PubMed ID: 37635443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: two institutions' preliminary experience. Bogliolo S; Mereu L; Cassani C; Gardella B; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Babilonti L; Delpezzo C; Tateo S; Spinillo A Int J Med Robot; 2015 Jun; 11(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 25231021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of surgical outcomes and learning curve of surgical parameters for robotic hysterectomy: a comparison between multiport versus single-site. Gardella B; Dominoni M; Gritti A; Musacchi V; Stracquadaini M; Bogliolo S; Scudeller L; Spinillo A Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Aug; 31(6):954-961. PubMed ID: 35225752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between single-site and multiport robot-assisted hysterectomy in obese patients with endometrial cancer: An Italian multi-institutional study. Corrado G; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Cela V; Gardella B; Sperduti I; Certelli C; Pellegrini A; Posar G; Zampa A; Tateo S; Gadducci A; Spinillo A; Vizza E Int J Med Robot; 2020 Apr; 16(2):e2066. PubMed ID: 31850677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery. Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic. Gungor M; Kahraman K; Dursun P; Ozbasli E; Genim C J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28429119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients. Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical outcome for robotic-assisted single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) in female-to male reassignment compared to its use in benign gynecological disease: a single center experience. Gardella B; Dominoni M; Bogliolo S; Spinillo A J Robot Surg; 2021 Aug; 15(4):579-584. PubMed ID: 32880794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic Trachelectomy After Supracervical Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Disease. Tsafrir Z; Aoun J; Hanna R; Papalekas E; Schiff L; Theoharis E; Eisenstein D JSLS; 2016; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 27493470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study. El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy. Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]