These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31307743)

  • 21. Robotic-assisted vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted single-site port for benign hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.
    Thigpen B; Connell P; Erfani H; Koythong T; Sunkara S; Guan X
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2487-2494. PubMed ID: 37523047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
    Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
    Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) hysterectomy as a scarless and gasless surgery.
    Yang YS
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):492-500. PubMed ID: 31728751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes of Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy Compared with Single-Port Access Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
    Noh JJ; Jeon JE; Jung JH; Kim TJ
    J Pers Med; 2023 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37511791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictors of 30-day readmission following hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications at a tertiary care academic medical center.
    Lee MS; Venkatesh KK; Growdon WB; Ecker JL; York-Best CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):607.e1-607.e12. PubMed ID: 26704895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use?
    Fanfani F; Restaino S; Ercoli A; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; Gallotta V; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Scambia G
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Aug; 68(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 26633042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Prodromidou A; Spartalis E; Tsourouflis G; Dimitroulis D; Nikiteas N
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):679-686. PubMed ID: 31956926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
    Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy.
    Gomes MTV; Machado AMN; Podgaec S; Barison GAS
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2017; 15(4):476-480. PubMed ID: 29364368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison between Robotic Single-Site and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy: Multicentric Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.
    Gardella B; Dominoni M; Gritti A; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Torella M; Fanfani F; Malzoni M; Couso A; Zapico A; Zapardiel I
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jan; 59(1):. PubMed ID: 36676747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A single-center study.
    Oyama K; Kanno K; Kojima R; Shirane A; Yanai S; Ota Y; Andou M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):405-411. PubMed ID: 30426602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.
    Moawad GN; Abi Khalil ED; Tyan P; Shu MK; Samuel D; Amdur R; Scheib SA; Marfori CQ
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Dec; 11(4):433-439. PubMed ID: 28144809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations.
    Wallwiener M; Taran FA; Rothmund R; Kasperkowiak A; Auwärter G; Ganz A; Kraemer B; Abele H; Schönfisch B; Isaacson KB; Brucker SY
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 288(6):1329-39. PubMed ID: 23775263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome.
    Cela V; Freschi L; Simi G; Ruggiero M; Tana R; Pluchino N
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Jul; 27(7):2638-43. PubMed ID: 23392975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surgery for Graves' disease in the era of robotic-assisted surgery: a study of safety and feasibility in the Western population.
    Garstka M; Kandil E; Saparova L; Bechara M; Green R; Haddad AB; Kang SW; Aidan P
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Nov; 403(7):891-896. PubMed ID: 30269213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single-site robotic total hysterectomy: standardization of technique and surgical outcomes.
    Sendag F; Akdemir A; Zeybek B; Ozdemir A; Gunusen I; Oztekin MK
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):689-94. PubMed ID: 24530696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Fabrizi L; Colantonio L; Cimino M; Sindico S; Forastiere E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2759-64. PubMed ID: 23468046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of quality of life, body image and surgical outcomes of robotic total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sentinel lymph node mapping in low-risk endometrial cancer patients - A Robotic Gyne Club study.
    Mereu L; Berlanda V; Surico D; Gardella B; Pertile R; Spinillo A; Tateo S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Sep; 99(9):1238-1245. PubMed ID: 32170875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.