226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31307973)
1. [Impacts of SNP genotyping call rate and SNP genotyping error rate on imputation accuracy inHolsteincattle].
Li Z; He J; Jiang J; G Tait R; Bauck S; Guo W; Wu XL
Yi Chuan; 2019 Jul; 41(7):644-652. PubMed ID: 31307973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips.
Boison SA; Santos DJ; Utsunomiya AH; Carvalheiro R; Neves HH; O'Brien AM; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MV
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4969-89. PubMed ID: 25958293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.
Khatkar MS; Moser G; Hayes BJ; Raadsma HW
BMC Genomics; 2012 Oct; 13():538. PubMed ID: 23043356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.
Mulder HA; Calus MP; Druet T; Schrooten C
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):876-89. PubMed ID: 22281352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips.
Segelke D; Chen J; Liu Z; Reinhardt F; Thaller G; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5403-5411. PubMed ID: 22916947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short communication: relationship of call rate and accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in dairy cattle.
Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM
J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3336-9. PubMed ID: 23497995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle.
Carvalheiro R; Boison SA; Neves HH; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Utsunomiya YT; O'Brien AM; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 25927950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.
Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N
BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Bink MC; Calus MP; van Eeuwijk FA; Hayes BJ; Hulsegge I; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jul; 46(1):41. PubMed ID: 25022768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between call rate per individual and genotyping accuracy of bovine single-nucleotide polymorphism array using deoxyribonucleic acid of various qualities.
Sasaki S; Yoshinari K; Uchiyama K; Takeda M; Kojima T
Anim Sci J; 2018 Nov; 89(11):1533-1539. PubMed ID: 30230122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle.
Piccoli ML; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Larmer SG; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2014 Dec; 15():157. PubMed ID: 25543517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.
Sollero BP; Howard JT; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2780-2792. PubMed ID: 31115442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of measures of correctness of genotype imputation in the context of genomic prediction: a review of livestock applications.
Calus MP; Bouwman AC; Hickey JM; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
Animal; 2014 Nov; 8(11):1743-53. PubMed ID: 25045914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Error rate for imputation from the Illumina BovineSNP50 chip to the Illumina BovineHD chip.
Schrooten C; Dassonneville R; Ducrocq V; Brøndum RF; Lund MS; Chen J; Liu Z; González-Recio O; Pena J; Druet T
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):10. PubMed ID: 24495554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-density marker imputation accuracy in sixteen French cattle breeds.
Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Venot E; Guillaume F; Dassonneville R; Fritz S; Ducrocq V; Phocas F; Boichard D; Croiseau P
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Sep; 45(1):33. PubMed ID: 24004563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.
Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of reference population size and available ancestor genotypes on imputation of Mexican Holstein genotypes.
García-Ruiz A; Ruiz-Lopez FJ; Wiggans GR; Van Tassell CP; Montaldo HH
J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3478-84. PubMed ID: 25771055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
