These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31307973)
1. [Impacts of SNP genotyping call rate and SNP genotyping error rate on imputation accuracy inHolsteincattle]. Li Z; He J; Jiang J; G Tait R; Bauck S; Guo W; Wu XL Yi Chuan; 2019 Jul; 41(7):644-652. PubMed ID: 31307973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips. Boison SA; Santos DJ; Utsunomiya AH; Carvalheiro R; Neves HH; O'Brien AM; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MV J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4969-89. PubMed ID: 25958293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle. Khatkar MS; Moser G; Hayes BJ; Raadsma HW BMC Genomics; 2012 Oct; 13():538. PubMed ID: 23043356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle. Mulder HA; Calus MP; Druet T; Schrooten C J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):876-89. PubMed ID: 22281352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips. Segelke D; Chen J; Liu Z; Reinhardt F; Thaller G; Reents R J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5403-5411. PubMed ID: 22916947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy. Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short communication: relationship of call rate and accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in dairy cattle. Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3336-9. PubMed ID: 23497995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle. Carvalheiro R; Boison SA; Neves HH; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Utsunomiya YT; O'Brien AM; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 25927950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation. Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle. van Binsbergen R; Bink MC; Calus MP; van Eeuwijk FA; Hayes BJ; Hulsegge I; Veerkamp RF Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jul; 46(1):41. PubMed ID: 25022768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits. Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between call rate per individual and genotyping accuracy of bovine single-nucleotide polymorphism array using deoxyribonucleic acid of various qualities. Sasaki S; Yoshinari K; Uchiyama K; Takeda M; Kojima T Anim Sci J; 2018 Nov; 89(11):1533-1539. PubMed ID: 30230122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle. Piccoli ML; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Larmer SG; Schenkel FS BMC Genet; 2014 Dec; 15():157. PubMed ID: 25543517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1. Sollero BP; Howard JT; Spangler ML J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2780-2792. PubMed ID: 31115442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of measures of correctness of genotype imputation in the context of genomic prediction: a review of livestock applications. Calus MP; Bouwman AC; Hickey JM; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA Animal; 2014 Nov; 8(11):1743-53. PubMed ID: 25045914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Error rate for imputation from the Illumina BovineSNP50 chip to the Illumina BovineHD chip. Schrooten C; Dassonneville R; Ducrocq V; Brøndum RF; Lund MS; Chen J; Liu Z; González-Recio O; Pena J; Druet T Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):10. PubMed ID: 24495554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-density marker imputation accuracy in sixteen French cattle breeds. Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Venot E; Guillaume F; Dassonneville R; Fritz S; Ducrocq V; Phocas F; Boichard D; Croiseau P Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Sep; 45(1):33. PubMed ID: 24004563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework. Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection. Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of reference population size and available ancestor genotypes on imputation of Mexican Holstein genotypes. García-Ruiz A; Ruiz-Lopez FJ; Wiggans GR; Van Tassell CP; Montaldo HH J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3478-84. PubMed ID: 25771055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]