225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31307973)
41. Evaluation of developed low-density genotype panels for imputation to higher density in independent dairy and beef cattle populations.
Judge MM; Kearney JF; McClure MC; Sleator RD; Berry DP
J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):949-62. PubMed ID: 27065257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle.
Zhang Z; Druet T
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5487-94. PubMed ID: 20965364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Use of the Illumina Bovine3K BeadChip in dairy genomic evaluation.
Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Vanraden PM; Olson KM; Tooker ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Mar; 95(3):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22365235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Imputation of genotypes from different single nucleotide polymorphism panels in dairy cattle.
Druet T; Schrooten C; de Roos AP
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5443-54. PubMed ID: 20965360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Imputation of missing genotypes from low- to high-density SNP panel in different population designs.
He S; Wang S; Fu W; Ding X; Zhang Q
Anim Genet; 2015 Feb; 46(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25431355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effects of reduced panel, reference origin, and genetic relationship on imputation of genotypes in Hereford cattle.
Huang Y; Maltecca C; Cassady JP; Alexander LJ; Snelling WM; MacNeil MD
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4203-8. PubMed ID: 22859753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Scanning and Filling: Ultra-Dense SNP Genotyping Combining Genotyping-By-Sequencing, SNP Array and Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.
Torkamaneh D; Belzile F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131533. PubMed ID: 26161900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prioritizing animals for dense genotyping in order to impute missing genotypes of sparsely genotyped animals.
Yu X; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Aug; 46(1):46. PubMed ID: 25158690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Genotype imputation in a tropical crossbred dairy cattle population.
Oliveira Júnior GA; Chud TCS; Ventura RV; Garrick DJ; Cole JB; Munari DP; Ferraz JBS; Mullart E; DeNise S; Smith S; da Silva MVGB
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Dec; 100(12):9623-9634. PubMed ID: 28987572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Extent of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase, and imputation accuracy within and across Canadian dairy breeds.
Larmer SG; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):3128-41. PubMed ID: 24582440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Genotype Imputation to Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Rabbits.
Mancin E; Sosa-Madrid BS; Blasco A; Ibáñez-Escriche N
Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken.
Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M
BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Imputation of non-genotyped sheep from the genotypes of their mates and resulting progeny.
Berry DP; McHugh N; Randles S; Wall E; McDermott K; Sargolzaei M; O'Brien AC
Animal; 2018 Feb; 12(2):191-198. PubMed ID: 28712375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Estimation of variance and genomic prediction using genotypes imputed from low-density marker subsets for carcass traits in Japanese black cattle.
Ogawa S; Matsuda H; Taniguchi Y; Watanabe T; Sugimoto Y; Iwaisaki H
Anim Sci J; 2016 Sep; 87(9):1106-13. PubMed ID: 26685777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. High concordance of bovine single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes generated using two independent genotyping strategies.
Magee DA; Berkowicz EW; Sikora KM; Sweeney T; Kenny DA; Kelly AK; Evans RD; Wickham BW; Bradley DG; Spillane C; MacHugh DE
Anim Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 21(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 20967645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Accuracy of imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes from low-density panels in Japanese Black cattle.
Ogawa S; Matsuda H; Taniguchi Y; Watanabe T; Takasuga A; Sugimoto Y; Iwaisaki H
Anim Sci J; 2016 Jan; 87(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 26032028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Assessing single-nucleotide polymorphism selection methods for the development of a low-density panel optimized for imputation in South African Drakensberger beef cattle.
Lashmar SF; Berry DP; Pierneef R; Muchadeyi FC; Visser C
J Anim Sci; 2021 Jul; 99(7):. PubMed ID: 33860324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A strategy to improve phasing of whole-genome sequenced individuals through integration of familial information from dense genotype panels.
Faux P; Druet T
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):46. PubMed ID: 28511677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluation of the accuracy of imputed sequence variant genotypes and their utility for causal variant detection in cattle.
Pausch H; MacLeod IM; Fries R; Emmerling R; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):24. PubMed ID: 28222685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
