These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31309118)

  • 1. Comparability of Self-Ratings and Observer Ratings in Occupational Psychosocial Risk Assessments: Is There Agreement?
    Schneider I; Mädler M; Lang J
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8382160. PubMed ID: 31309118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consideration of psychosocial factors in workplace risk assessments: findings from a company survey in Germany.
    Beck D; Lenhardt U
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2019 Apr; 92(3):435-451. PubMed ID: 30756179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity and reliability of exposure assessors' ratings of exposure intensity by type of occupational questionnaire and type of rater.
    Friesen MC; Coble JB; Katki HA; Ji BT; Xue S; Lu W; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):601-11. PubMed ID: 21511891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Luebeck interview for psychosocial screening in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
    Kunzendorf S; Jantschek G; Straubinger K; Heberlein I; Homann N; Ludwig D; Benninghoven D
    Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2007 Jan; 13(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 17206637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of animal welfare indicators for the on-farm self-assessment of fattening pigs.
    Pfeifer M; Eggemann L; Kransmann J; Schmitt AO; Hessel EF
    Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1712-1720. PubMed ID: 30630538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and Validation of a Practical Instrument for Injury Prevention: The Occupational Safety and Health Monitoring and Assessment Tool (OSH-MAT).
    Sun Y; Arning M; Bochmann F; Börger J; Heitmann T
    Saf Health Work; 2018 Jun; 9(2):140-143. PubMed ID: 29928526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Observer reliability of arteriovenous malformations grading scales using current imaging modalities.
    Griessenauer CJ; Miller JH; Agee BS; Fisher WS; Curé JK; Chapman PR; Foreman PM; Fisher WA; Witcher AC; Walters BC
    J Neurosurg; 2014 May; 120(5):1179-87. PubMed ID: 24628617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of an observational rating scale for repetition, posture, and force in selected manufacturing settings.
    Ebersole ML; Armstrong TJ
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(3):487-98. PubMed ID: 17063964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.
    Burr H; Formazin M; Pohrt A
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2016 May; 42(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 26960179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Perceived Stress Related to Migration and Acculturation in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders (MIGSTR10)-Development, Reliability, and Dimensionality of a Brief Instrument.
    Müller MJ; Zink S; Koch E
    Psychiatr Q; 2017 Sep; 88(3):473-483. PubMed ID: 27558563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corrigendum to "Comparability of Self-Ratings and Observer Ratings in Occupational Psychosocial Risk Assessments: Is There Agreement?".
    Schneider I; Mädler M; Lang J
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():6425845. PubMed ID: 32685513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Occupational differences in exposure to hazardous work conditions].
    Marinacci C; d'Errico A; Cardano M; Perini F; Costa G
    Med Lav; 2005; 96 Suppl():s127-40. PubMed ID: 15871624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
    Kantor J
    JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. OSH related risks and opportunities for industrial human-robot interaction: results from literature and practice.
    Heinold E; Funk M; Niehaus S; Rosen PH; Wischniewski S
    Front Robot AI; 2023; 10():1277360. PubMed ID: 37965632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Occupation-level automation probability is associated with psychosocial work conditions and workers' health: A multilevel study.
    Cheng WJ; Pien LC; Cheng Y
    Am J Ind Med; 2021 Feb; 64(2):108-117. PubMed ID: 33350480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Exposure to psychosocial stressors at work in the Pays de la Loire region in 2002].
    Roquelaure Y; Ha C; Gohier B; Dano C; Touranchet A; Leclerc A; Imbernon E; Goldberg M
    Encephale; 2007; 33(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 17675911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing Stress Management Programs in a Public Primary Healthcare Institution: Should We Consider Health Workers' Sociodemographic Groups?
    Dudutienė D; Juodaitė-Račkauskienė A; Stukas R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Apr; 56(4):. PubMed ID: 32260214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring psychosocial recovery after brain injury: change versus competency.
    Tate RL; Pfaff A; Veerabangsa A; Hodgkinson AE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 85(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 15083428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they?
    Ulmar B; Wölfle-Roos J; Kocak T; Brunner A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Oct; 20(1):485. PubMed ID: 31656177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.