181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31309290)
1. Impact of using 29 MHz high-resolution micro-ultrasound in real-time targeting of transrectal prostate biopsies: initial experience.
Abouassaly R; Klein EA; El-Shefai A; Stephenson A
World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1201-1206. PubMed ID: 31309290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate Mapping for Cancer Diagnosis: The Madrid Protocol. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion and Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsies.
Rodríguez Socarrás ME; Gomez Rivas J; Cuadros Rivera V; Reinoso Elbers J; Llanes González L; Michel Mercado I; Fernandez Del Alamo J; Juarez Del Dago P; Sancha FG
J Urol; 2020 Oct; 204(4):726-733. PubMed ID: 32314932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer.
Claros OR; Tourinho-Barbosa RR; Fregeville A; Gallardo AC; Muttin F; Carneiro A; Stabile A; Moschini M; Macek P; Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 31821099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy replace saturation prostate biopsy in the re-evaluation of men in active surveillance?
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
World J Urol; 2016 Sep; 34(9):1249-53. PubMed ID: 26699628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.
Yarlagadda VK; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Porter KK; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Rais-Bahrami S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):115-120. PubMed ID: 29770762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of real-time elastography on magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies.
Brock M; Löppenberg B; Roghmann F; Pelzer A; Dickmann M; Becker W; Martin-Seidel P; Sommerer F; Schenk L; Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; von Bodman C
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1191-7. PubMed ID: 25451832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Micro-ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Lughezzani G; Saita A; Lazzeri M; Paciotti M; Maffei D; Lista G; Hurle R; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Casale P
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):329-332. PubMed ID: 31200848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Additive Value of Transrectal Systematic Ventral Biopsies in Combination with Magnet Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy in Patients with 3 or More Negative Prostate Biopsies.
Maxeiner A; Nest AM; Stephan C; Cash H; Baur ADJ; Fischer T; Kilic E; Piper SK; Nowak CP; Busch J; Miller K; Mang J
Urol Int; 2020; 104(3-4):205-213. PubMed ID: 31801153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.
Costa DN; Kay FU; Pedrosa I; Kolski L; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Rofsky NM
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e15-149.e21. PubMed ID: 27939349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided In-bore and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsies: An Adjusted Comparison of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate.
Costa DN; Goldberg K; Leon AD; Lotan Y; Xi Y; Aziz M; Freifeld Y; Margulis V; Raj G; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Desai N; Bagrodia A; Francis F; Pedrosa I; Cadeddu JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Jul; 2(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 31277776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of Targeted Prostate Biopsy by Adding Micro-Ultrasound to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pathway.
Wiemer L; Hollenbach M; Heckmann R; Kittner B; Plage H; Reimann M; Asbach P; Friedersdorff F; Schlomm T; Hofbauer S; Cash H
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1292-1299. PubMed ID: 32654967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of Benign Lesions: Recommendations for Repeat Sampling.
Chelluri R; Kilchevsky A; George AK; Sidana A; Frye TP; Su D; Fascelli M; Ho R; Abboud SF; Turkbey B; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26880408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted versus three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsies: Size does matter.
Peltier A; Aoun F; Albisinni S; Marcelis Q; Ledinh D; Paesmans M; Lemort M; van Velthoven R
Scand J Urol; 2016 Jun; 50(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 26754860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cognitive MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted prostate biopsy according to PI-RADS classification in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy results.
Lai WJ; Wang HK; Liu HT; Park BK; Shen SH; Lin TP; Chung HJ; Huang YH; Chang YH
J Chin Med Assoc; 2016 Nov; 79(11):618-624. PubMed ID: 27567440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
