These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31309357)

  • 1. A Capabilities Approach to Prenatal Screening for Fetal Abnormalities.
    Stapleton G; Dondorp W; Schröder-Bäck P; de Wert G
    Health Care Anal; 2019 Dec; 27(4):309-321. PubMed ID: 31309357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challenges.
    de Jong A; Maya I; van Lith JM
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25521968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.
    Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RJH
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 30340550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
    Chitayat D; Langlois S; Douglas Wilson R; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):736-750. PubMed ID: 21749752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prenatal screening: an ethical agenda for the near future.
    de Jong A; de Wert GM
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 25521973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-cultural perspectives on decision making regarding noninvasive prenatal testing: A comparative study of Lebanon and Quebec.
    Haidar H; Vanstone M; Laberge AM; Bibeau G; Ghulmiyyah L; Ravitsky V
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 29847254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Qualifying choice: ethical reflection on the scope of prenatal screening.
    Stapleton G
    Med Health Care Philos; 2017 Jun; 20(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 27631408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facilitating autonomous, confident and satisfying choices: a mixed-method study of women's choice-making in prenatal screening for common aneuploidies.
    Chen A; Tenhunen H; Torkki P; Peltokorpi A; Heinonen S; Lillrank P; Stefanovic V
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 29720125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal testing: Does reproductive autonomy succeed in dispelling eugenic concerns?
    Begović D
    Bioethics; 2019 Oct; 33(8):958-964. PubMed ID: 31264236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychological aspects of individualized choice and reproductive autonomy in prenatal screening.
    Hewison J
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 25521969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prenatal Diagnosis Procedures and Techniques to Obtain a Diagnostic Fetal Specimen or Tissue: Maternal and Fetal Risks and Benefits.
    Wilson RD; Gagnon A; Audibert F; Campagnolo C; Carroll J;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Jul; 37(7):656-668. PubMed ID: 26366824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new ethical landscape of prenatal testing: individualizing choice to serve autonomy and promote public health: a radical proposal.
    Munthe C
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 25521972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproductive deliberation: Supporting autonomous decision making in prenatal genetic counseling.
    Warton C; Johnston M; Mills C
    J Genet Couns; 2023 Jun; 32(3):576-583. PubMed ID: 36765016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determinants associated with making prenatal screening decisions in a national study.
    Bakst S; Romano-Zelekha O; Ostrovsky J; Shohat T
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 30244627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies.
    Audibert F; Gagnon A; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):754-67. PubMed ID: 21749753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethics in reproductive genetics.
    Fletcher JC; Evans MI
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 35(4):763-82. PubMed ID: 1451360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "The Top Priority Is a Healthy Baby": Narratives of Health, Disability, and Abortion in Online Pregnancy Forum Discussions in the US and China.
    Li G; Chandrasekharan S; Allyse M
    J Genet Couns; 2017 Feb; 26(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27277130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of 'routinisation' in prenatal screening.
    Kater-Kuipers A; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RH; Bunnik EM
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Sep; 44(9):626-631. PubMed ID: 29695408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Just choice: a Danielsian analysis of the aims and scope of prenatal screening for fetal abnormalities.
    Stapleton G; Dondorp W; Schröder-Bäck P; de Wert G
    Med Health Care Philos; 2019 Dec; 22(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 30771074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic counselling, patient education, and informed decision-making in the genomic era.
    Metcalfe SA
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Apr; 23(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 29233487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.