These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31309529)

  • 1. The transfer of location-based control requires location-based conflict.
    Pickel L; Pratt J; Weidler BJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2788-2797. PubMed ID: 31309529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional control transfers beyond the reference frame.
    Weidler BJ; Dey A; Bugg JM
    Psychol Res; 2020 Feb; 84(1):217-230. PubMed ID: 29356893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alertness and cognitive control: Is there a spatial attention constraint?
    Schneider DW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):119-136. PubMed ID: 30353501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transfer of location-specific control to untrained locations.
    Weidler BJ; Bugg JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2202-17. PubMed ID: 26800157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymmetry of congruency effects in spatial Stroop tasks can be eliminated.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 May; 143(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 23500109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer of learned cognitive control settings within and between tasks.
    Ileri-Tayar M; Moss C; Bugg JM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2022 Dec; 196():107689. PubMed ID: 36374800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects.
    Wühr P; Duthoo W; Notebaert W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):779-801. PubMed ID: 25380403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks.
    West R
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(8):1122-35. PubMed ID: 12667546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociable early attentional control mechanisms underlying cognitive and affective conflicts.
    Chen T; Kendrick KM; Feng C; Sun S; Yang X; Wang X; Luo W; Yang S; Huang X; Valdés-Sosa PA; Gong Q; Fan J; Luo YJ
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37633. PubMed ID: 27892513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color stroop task.
    Marini M; Iani C; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 21592943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conflict-specific effects of accessory stimuli on cognitive control in the Stroop task and the Simon task.
    Soutschek A; Müller HJ; Schubert T
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 23128585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. List-level control in the flanker task.
    Bugg JM; Gonthier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Sep; 73(9):1444-1459. PubMed ID: 32103700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When stimulus-driven control settings compete: On the dominance of categories as cues for control.
    Bugg JM; Dey A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1905-1932. PubMed ID: 30211592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI.
    Liu X; Banich MT; Jacobson BL; Tanabe JL
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1097-106. PubMed ID: 15219581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generality and specificity in cognitive control: conflict adaptation within and across selective-attention tasks but not across selective-attention and Simon tasks.
    Freitas AL; Clark SL
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jan; 79(1):143-62. PubMed ID: 24487727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finding an interaction between Stroop congruency and flanker congruency requires a large congruency effect: A within-trial combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2271-2301. PubMed ID: 31974936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.