These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31310021)

  • 41. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue.
    Branigan HP; Pickering MJ; Cleland AA
    Cognition; 2000 May; 75(2):B13-25. PubMed ID: 10771277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Time Course of Lexicalization During Sentence Production in Parkinson's Disease: Eye-Tracking While Speaking.
    Lee J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Apr; 60(4):924-936. PubMed ID: 28384666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pupillary dynamics reveal computational cost in sentence planning.
    Sevilla Y; Maldonado M; Shalóm DE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1041-52. PubMed ID: 24712982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Planning sentences while doing other things at the same time: effects of concurrent verbal and visuospatial working memory load.
    Klaus J; Mädebach A; Oppermann F; Jescheniak JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):811-831. PubMed ID: 26985697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Oscillatory Brain Responses Reflect Anticipation during Comprehension of Speech Acts in Spoken Dialog.
    Gisladottir RS; Bögels S; Levinson SC
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():34. PubMed ID: 29467635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pupil dilation as a measure of processing load in simultaneous interpretation and other language tasks.
    Hyönä J; Tommola J; Alaja AM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Aug; 48(3):598-612. PubMed ID: 7568993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Competition between rhythmic and linguistic organization in a sentence-rhythm Stroop task.
    Getz LM; Salona P; Yu M; Kubovy M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(11):2243-54. PubMed ID: 25747914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Overhearers Use Addressee Backchannels in Dialog Comprehension.
    Tolins J; Fox Tree JE
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Aug; 40(6):1412-34. PubMed ID: 26331673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Ease of processing constrains the activation flow in the conceptual-lexical system during speech planning.
    Mädebach A; Jescheniak JD; Oppermann F; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):649-60. PubMed ID: 21341927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks.
    Cheng T; Wu JT
    J Vis Exp; 2019 Sep; (151):. PubMed ID: 31545324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Listening to the sound of silence: disfluent silent pauses in speech have consequences for listeners.
    MacGregor LJ; Corley M; Donaldson DI
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):3982-92. PubMed ID: 20950633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does word length affect speech onset latencies when producing single words?
    Damian MF; Bowers JS; Stadthagen-Gonzalez H; Spalek K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):892-905. PubMed ID: 20565208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cortical activation patterns of affective speech processing depend on concurrent demands on the subvocal rehearsal system. A DC-potential study.
    Pihan H; Altenmüller E; Hertrich I; Ackermann H
    Brain; 2000 Nov; 123 ( Pt 11)():2338-49. PubMed ID: 11050033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Using the readiness potential of button-press and verbal response within spoken language processing.
    Jansen S; Wesselmeier H; de Ruiter JP; Mueller HM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jul; 232():24-9. PubMed ID: 24809245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Speech dynamics are coded in the left motor cortex in fluent speakers but not in adults who stutter.
    Neef NE; Hoang TN; Neef A; Paulus W; Sommer M
    Brain; 2015 Mar; 138(Pt 3):712-25. PubMed ID: 25595146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. How and when predictability interacts with accentuation in temporally selective attention during speech comprehension.
    Li X; Lu Y; Zhao H
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():71-84. PubMed ID: 25250708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Taking Attention Away from the Auditory Modality: Context-dependent Effects on Early Sensory Encoding of Speech.
    Xie Z; Reetzke R; Chandrasekaran B
    Neuroscience; 2018 Aug; 384():64-75. PubMed ID: 29802881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pupillary responses and reaction times index different cognitive processes in a combined Go/Switch incidental learning task.
    Isabella SL; Urbain C; Cheyne JA; Cheyne D
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Apr; 127():48-56. PubMed ID: 30771402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The time course of argument reactivation revealed: using the visual world paradigm.
    Koring L; Mak P; Reuland E
    Cognition; 2012 Jun; 123(3):361-79. PubMed ID: 22475295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.