187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31310389)
1. Lesion distribution after cryoballoon ablation and hotballoon ablation: Late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging analysis.
Akita T; Kiuchi K; Fukuzawa K; Shimane A; Matsuyama S; Takami M; Kurose J; Oonishi H; Shigeru M; Nagamatsu YI; Suehiro H; Takemoto M; Nakamura T; Sakai J; Yatomi A; Mori S; Shimoyama S; Negi N; Kyotani K; Hirata KI
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1830-1840. PubMed ID: 31310389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lesion characteristics between cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency ablation with a contact force-sensing catheter: Late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging assessment.
Kurose J; Kiuchi K; Fukuzawa K; Takami M; Mori S; Suehiro H; Nagamatsu YI; Akita T; Takemoto M; Yatomi A; Nakamura T; Sakai J; Watanabe Y; Shimoyama S; Negi N; Kyotani K; Hirata KI
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2572-2581. PubMed ID: 32648326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lesion formation after pulmonary vein isolation using the advance cryoballoon and the standard cryoballoon: lessons learned from late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging.
Halbfass PM; Mitlacher M; Turschner O; Brachmann J; Mahnkopf C
Europace; 2015 Apr; 17(4):566-73. PubMed ID: 25614338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after multielectrode phased radiofrequency- and cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Wieczorek M; Sassani K; Hoeltgen R
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Apr; 20(1):197. PubMed ID: 32326885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of cryoballoon applications on lesion gaps detected by magnetic resonance after pulmonary vein isolation.
Trotta O; Alarcón F; Guasch E; Benito EM; San Antonio R; Perea RJ; Prat-Gonzalez S; Apolo J; Sitges M; Tolosana JM; Mont L;
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Mar; 31(3):638-646. PubMed ID: 31957087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrophysiologic and anatomic factors predictive of a need for touch-up radiofrequency application for complete pulmonary vein isolation: Comparison between hot balloon- and cryoballoon-based ablation.
Wakamatsu Y; Nagashima K; Nakahara S; Iso K; Watanabe R; Arai M; Otsuka N; Yagyu S; Kurokawa S; Ohkubo K; Nakai T; Okumura Y
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1261-1269. PubMed ID: 31111558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between atrial scar on cardiac magnetic resonance and pulmonary vein reconnection after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Jefairi NA; Camaioni C; Sridi S; Cheniti G; Takigawa M; Nivet H; Denis A; Derval N; Mathilde Merle ; Laurent F; Montaudon M; Sacher F; Hocini M; Haissaguerre M; Jais P; Cochet H
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 May; 30(5):727-740. PubMed ID: 30847990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The importance of extrapulmonary vein triggers and atypical atrial flutter in atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoablation: Insights from repeat ablation procedures.
Chang TY; Lo LW; Te ALD; Lin YJ; Chang SL; Hu YF; Chung FP; Chao TF; Liao JN; Tuan TC; Lin CY; Vicera JJ; Huang TC; Hoang MQ; Yamada S; Chen SA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 30230088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postablation cerebral embolisms in balloon-based atrial fibrillation ablation with periprocedural direct oral anticoagulants: A comparison between cryoballoon and HotBalloon ablation.
Nakamura K; Sasaki T; Take Y; Okazaki Y; Inoue M; Motoda H; Miki Y; Niijima K; Yamashita E; Koyama K; Funabashi N; Naito S
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30288849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preprocedure Application of Machine Learning and Mechanistic Simulations Predicts Likelihood of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation.
Shade JK; Ali RL; Basile D; Popescu D; Akhtar T; Marine JE; Spragg DD; Calkins H; Trayanova NA
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2020 Jul; 13(7):e008213. PubMed ID: 32536204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hot Balloon Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Lesion Characteristics and Middle-Term Outcomes.
Nagashima K; Okumura Y; Watanabe I; Nakahara S; Hori Y; Iso K; Watanabe R; Arai M; Wakamatsu Y; Kurokawa S; Mano H; Nakai T; Ohkubo K; Hirayama A
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 11(5):e005861. PubMed ID: 29700055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency lesions as detected by late-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance after ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.
Alarcón F; Cabanelas N; Izquierdo M; Benito E; Figueras I Ventura R; Guasch E; Prat-Gonzalez S; Perea RJ; Borràs R; Trotta O; Arbelo E; Tolosana JM; Sitges M; Berruezo A; Brugada J; Mont L
Europace; 2020 Mar; 22(3):382-387. PubMed ID: 31821484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of myocardial injury and inflammation after pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation between radiofrequency catheter ablation and cryoballoon ablation.
Yano M; Egami Y; Yanagawa K; Nakamura H; Matsuhiro Y; Yasumoto K; Tsuda M; Okamoto N; Tanaka A; Matsunaga-Lee Y; Yamato M; Shutta R; Nishino M; Tanouchi J
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):1315-1322. PubMed ID: 32250506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of touch-up ablation rate and pulmonary vein isolation durability between hot balloon and cryoballoon.
Hojo R; Fukamizu S; Tokioka S; Inagaki D; Miyazawa S; Kawamura I; Kitamura T; Sakurada H; Hiraoka M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):1298-1306. PubMed ID: 32270566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence of silent cerebral infarctions after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing the second-generation cryoballoon.
Nakamura T; Okishige K; Kanazawa T; Yamashita M; Kawaguchi N; Kato N; Aoyagi H; Yamauchi Y; Sasano T; Hirao K
Europace; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1681-1688. PubMed ID: 27702854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in scar lesion formation between radiofrequency and cryoballoon in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison study using ultra-high-density mapping.
Ruiz-Granell R; Ballesteros G; Andreu D; Erkiaga A; Ferrero-De-Loma-Osorio A; Ramos P; Martínez-Brotons A; Vives-Rodríguez E; Izquierdo-de-Francisco M; García-Bolao I
Europace; 2019 Feb; 21(2):250-258. PubMed ID: 30321320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of energy source on early atrial fibrillation recurrences: a comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency current energy ablation with the endpoint of unexcitability in pulmonary vein isolation.
Gunawardene MA; Hoffmann BA; Schaeffer B; Chung DU; Moser J; Akbulak RO; Jularic M; Eickholt C; Nuehrich J; Meyer C; Willems S
Europace; 2018 Jan; 20(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 27742775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The fourth cryoballoon generation with a shorter tip to facilitate real-time pulmonary vein potential recording: Feasibility and safety results.
Straube F; Dorwarth U; Pongratz J; Brück B; Wankerl M; Hartl S; Hoffmann E
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):918-925. PubMed ID: 30907462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients.
Takamiya T; Nitta J; Inaba O; Sato A; Inamura Y; Kato N; Murata K; Ikenouchi T; Kono T; Nitta G; Matsumura Y; Takahashi Y; Goya M; Sasano T
Heart Vessels; 2020 Dec; 35(12):1709-1716. PubMed ID: 32524235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-invasive assessment of pulmonary vein isolation durability using late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging.
Padilla-Cueto D; Ferro E; Garre P; Prat S; Guichard JB; Perea RJ; Tolosana JM; Guasch E; Arbelo E; Porta-Sanchéz A; Roca-Luque I; Sitges M; Brugada J; Mont L; Althoff TF
Europace; 2023 Feb; 25(2):360-365. PubMed ID: 36125227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
