159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31310418)
1. Impact of uterine weight on robotic hysterectomy: Analysis of 500 cases in a single institute.
Akazawa M; Lee SL; Liu WM
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Oct; 15(5):e2026. PubMed ID: 31310418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.
Moawad GN; Abi Khalil ED; Tyan P; Shu MK; Samuel D; Amdur R; Scheib SA; Marfori CQ
J Robot Surg; 2017 Dec; 11(4):433-439. PubMed ID: 28144809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgery in challenging hysterectomies - a single institutional experience.
Perutelli A; Domenici L; Garibaldi S; Albanesi G; Baroni C; Salvati L; Salvati N; Cecchi E; Bottone P; Salerno MG
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Feb; 26(4):1235-1240. PubMed ID: 35253179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g.
Gupta N; Mohling S; Mckendrick R; Elkattah R; Holcombe J; Furr RS; Boren T; DePasquale S
J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):641-645. PubMed ID: 29453729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.
Silasi DA; Gallo T; Silasi M; Menderes G; Azodi M
JSLS; 2013; 17(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 24018076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining Optimal Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: Clinical Decision Tree Algorithm.
Schmitt JJ; Carranza Leon DA; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; Dowdy SC; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Pasupathy KS; Gebhart JB
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 129(1):130-138. PubMed ID: 27926638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
Avondstondt AM; Wallenstein M; D'Adamo CR; Ehsanipoor RM
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 28439744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: two institutions' preliminary experience.
Bogliolo S; Mereu L; Cassani C; Gardella B; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Babilonti L; Delpezzo C; Tateo S; Spinillo A
Int J Med Robot; 2015 Jun; 11(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 25231021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons.
Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Nishikawa M; North A; Amdur R; Sparks A; Kazma JM; Moawad GN
J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 32253574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
