These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31310964)

  • 1. Later but not early stages of familiar face recognition depend strongly on attentional resources: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Wiese H; Ingram BT; Elley ML; Tüttenberg SC; Burton AM; Young AW
    Cortex; 2019 Nov; 120():147-158. PubMed ID: 31310964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting a viewer's familiarity with a face: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and classifier analyses.
    Wiese H; Anderson D; Beierholm U; Tüttenberg SC; Young AW; Burton AM
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Jan; 59(1):e13950. PubMed ID: 34587297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Familiarity is familiarity is familiarity: Event-related brain potentials reveal qualitatively similar representations of personally familiar and famous faces.
    Wiese H; Hobden G; Siilbek E; Martignac V; Flack TR; Ritchie KL; Young AW; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1144-1164. PubMed ID: 34672660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revisiting the earliest electrophysiological correlate of familiar face recognition.
    Huang W; Wu X; Hu L; Wang L; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():42-53. PubMed ID: 28684327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():181-90. PubMed ID: 18793621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Robust Neural Index of High Face Familiarity.
    Wiese H; Tüttenberg SC; Ingram BT; Chan CYX; Gurbuz Z; Burton AM; Young AW
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Feb; 30(2):261-272. PubMed ID: 30557087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Similar distraction, but differential suppression, for faces and non-face objects: Evidence from behaviour and event-related potentials.
    Neumann MF; Viska CG; van Huis S; Palermo R
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Nov; 139():39-46. PubMed ID: 30292783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased N250 elicited by facial familiarity: An ERP study including the face inversion effect and facial emotion processing.
    Abreu AL; Fernández-Aguilar L; Ferreira-Santos F; Fernandes C
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Sep; 188():108623. PubMed ID: 37356541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Properties of familiar face representations: Only contrast positive faces contain all information necessary for efficient recognition.
    Wiese H; Chan CYX; Tüttenberg SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1583-1598. PubMed ID: 30299131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The activation of visual face memory and explicit face recognition are delayed in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Parketny J; Towler J; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():538-47. PubMed ID: 26169316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An item's status in semantic memory determines how it is recognized: Dissociable patterns of brain activity observed for famous and unfamiliar faces.
    MacKenzie G; Alexandrou G; Hancock PJB; Donaldson DI
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Oct; 119():292-301. PubMed ID: 30096413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological correlates of face-evoked person knowledge.
    Taylor J; Shehzad Z; McCarthy G
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Jul; 118():136-146. PubMed ID: 27241517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face and object encoding under perceptual load: ERP evidence.
    Neumann MF; Mohamed TN; Schweinberger SR
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(4):3021-7. PubMed ID: 21044688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is your own face more than a highly familiar face?
    Alzueta E; Melcón M; Poch C; Capilla A
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Mar; 142():100-107. PubMed ID: 30738092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The time it takes to truly know someone: Neurophysiological correlates of face and identity learning during the first two years.
    Popova T; Wiese H
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Apr; 170():108312. PubMed ID: 35288213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Configural and featural face processing are differently modulated by attentional resources at early stages: an event-related potential study with rapid serial visual presentation.
    Wang H; Sun P; Ip C; Zhao X; Fu S
    Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1602():75-84. PubMed ID: 25601005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. N250r ERP repetition effects from distractor faces when attending to another face under load: Evidence for a face attention resource.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2009 May; 1270():64-77. PubMed ID: 19306855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The P200 predominantly reflects distance-to-norm in face space whereas the N250 reflects activation of identity-specific representations of known faces.
    Wuttke SJ; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jan; 140():86-95. PubMed ID: 30529289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.