These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31311474)

  • 1. Individual willingness to leave a safe refuge and the trade-off between food and safety: a test with social fish.
    Balaban-Feld J; Mitchell WA; Kotler BP; Vijayan S; Tov Elem LT; Rosenzweig ML; Abramsky Z
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Jul; 286(1907):20190826. PubMed ID: 31311474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. State-dependent foraging among social fish in a risky environment.
    Balaban-Feld J; Mitchell WA; Kotler BP; Vijayan S; Tov Elem LT; Abramsky Z
    Oecologia; 2019 May; 190(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 30929073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal foraging of little egrets and their prey in a foraging game in a patchy environment.
    Katz MW; Abramsky Z; Kotler BP; Rosenzweig ML; Alteshtein O; Vasserman G
    Am Nat; 2013 Mar; 181(3):381-95. PubMed ID: 23448887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social behaviour and foraging success of little egrets (Egretta garzetta).
    Vardi R; Kotler BP; Altstein O; Abramsky Z
    Behav Processes; 2021 Feb; 183():104318. PubMed ID: 33434628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does the presence of a conspecific individual change the behavioral game that a predator plays with its prey?
    Vardi R; Abramsky Z; Kotler BP; Altstein O; Rosenzweig ML
    Oecologia; 2017 Jul; 184(3):597-607. PubMed ID: 28516320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Refuge quality impacts the strength of nonconsumptive effects on prey.
    Donelan SC; Grabowski JH; Trussell GC
    Ecology; 2017 Feb; 98(2):403-411. PubMed ID: 27861773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time to revisit? A predator's previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches.
    Vijayan S; Lee JK; Balaban-Feld J; Mitchell WA; Kotler BP; Rosenzweig ML; Lotan TT; Abramsky Z
    Oecologia; 2019 Jun; 190(2):387-397. PubMed ID: 31147778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binary patch assessment by goldfish under safe and dangerous conditions.
    Vijayan S; Kotler BP; Tamar Tov-Elem L; Mitchell WA; Abramsky Z
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():417-421. PubMed ID: 30056079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foraging patterns of voles at heterogeneous avian and uniform mustelid predation risk.
    Eccard JA; Pusenius J; Sundell J; Halle S; Ylönen H
    Oecologia; 2008 Oct; 157(4):725-34. PubMed ID: 18648858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cost of safety: refuges increase the impact of predation risk in aquatic systems.
    Orrock JL; Preisser EL; Grabowski JH; Trussell GC
    Ecology; 2013 Mar; 94(3):573-9. PubMed ID: 23687883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trade‐offs between supportive and provisioning ecosystem services of forage species in marine food webs.
    Essington TE; Munch SB
    Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(6):1543-57. PubMed ID: 29160672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predator species related adaptive changes in larval growth and digestive physiology.
    Jiang B; Johansson F; Stoks R; Mauersberger R; Mikolajewski DJ
    J Insect Physiol; 2019 Apr; 114():23-29. PubMed ID: 30716335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of spatial food distribution and group size on foraging behaviour in a benthic fish.
    Stenberg M; Persson A
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15908140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reefscapes of fear: predation risk and reef hetero-geneity interact to shape herbivore foraging behaviour.
    Catano LB; Rojas MC; Malossi RJ; Peters JR; Heithaus MR; Fourqurean JW; Burkepile DE
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):146-56. PubMed ID: 26332988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predator olfactory cues generate a foraging-predation trade-off through prey apprehension.
    Siepielski AM; Fallon E; Boersma K
    R Soc Open Sci; 2016 Feb; 3(2):150537. PubMed ID: 26998324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Foraging and vulnerability traits modify predator-prey body mass allometry: freshwater macroinvertebrates as a case study.
    Klecka J; Boukal DS
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Sep; 82(5):1031-41. PubMed ID: 23869526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training fish for restocking: refuge and predator training in the hatchery has limited benefits for a marine fish.
    Rae DL; Mos B; Scott A; Dworjanyn SA
    J Fish Biol; 2020 Jul; 97(1):172-182. PubMed ID: 32278329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wintering birds avoid warm sunshine: predation and the costs of foraging in sunlight.
    Carr JM; Lima SL
    Oecologia; 2014 Mar; 174(3):713-21. PubMed ID: 24132503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. --Effect of multimodal cues from a predatory fish on refuge use and foraging on an amphidromous shrimp.
    Ocasio-Torres ME; Crowl TA; Sabat AM
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11011. PubMed ID: 33763304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential fitness returns in relation to spatial position in groups.
    Krause J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1994 May; 69(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 8054444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.